The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulation of Growth and Yield in Cotton: I. Gross Photosynthesis, Respiration, and Growth1
Abstract
A valid simulation of crop growth and yield requires quantitative data on the effect of the environment on photosynthesis, respiration and organ development. Seedling growth and boll growth of cotton, (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were studied in the phytotron at Duke University. We found extremely high respiration rates in the seedlings and an efficiency in the conversion of photosynthate to dry matter of 33% for the first 0.3 g accumulated and 53.5% for the next 0.5 g. Boll growth is exponential at first and then becomes linear. Growth efficiency in young bolls ranges from 67% at 18 C to 77% at 28 C. Later boll growth efficiency was essentially constant at about 61% at mean temperatures commonly found in the cotton belt, e.g., 26 – 27 C. Photosynthesis and respiration were measured in field stands during the boll‐filling stage with 2m ✕ 2m plexiglass chambers. Light respiration varied with temperature (25 to 42 C) from 8 to 15% of gross photosynthesis at a light intensity of 700 Wm−2. The ratio of total respiration to photosynthesis (R/P) varied diurnally, ranging from 0.29 under intense light [0900 local standard time (LST)] to infinity at sundown.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By the mid-1970s, fundamental equations were developed to describe cotton growth and development (Baker et al., 1972; McKinion et al., 1975; Wanjura et al., 1973), cotton plant N balance (Jones et al., 1974), ET, and soil water balance (Ritchie, 1972; Shirazi et al., 1976).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Baker et al., 1972
In the citing paper
“Significant contributions were made from several institutions (Baker et al., 1972, 1976, 1983; Hesketh and Baker, 1967; Hesketh et al., 1971, 1972; Lambert et al., 1976; McKinion et al., 1975; Wanjura et al., 1973) in the years after that first meeting.”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Baker et al., 1972
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, D. N., Hesketh, J. D., & Duncan, W. G.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Agriculture (US)
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1972-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-435
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1964348209
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, crop growth simulation, gross photosynthesis, respiration, seedling growth, growth efficiency, temperature effects, light respiration, diurnal variation, phytotron
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review