The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Water Stress on Canopy Senescence and Carbon Exchange Rates in Cotton1
Abstract
The work reported here was done as part of an effort to develop a physiological process level data base for the simulation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and yield. The effects of water stress on vegetative growth and on carbon exchange rate (CER) in cotton canopies were investigated in naturally illuminated, controlled environment cabinets (SPAR units). The control treatment was irrigated daily. In the other treatments, irrigation was stopped just before the appearance of the first blooms. An extra low water treatment was allowed to dry much faster than the low water treatment. Water stress had a strong effect on vegetative growth. Rate of increase in plant height and leaf area declined when midday leaf water potential was lower than −1.4 MPa, and they were almost zero at −2.0 to −2.5 MPa. Water stress had a similar effect on the CER over a wide range of radiation intensities. CER started to decline < 2 weeks after irrigation was stopped, and it was about 50% of the control when midday leaf water potential reached −2.0 to −2.5 MPa. Two different mechanisms are suggested for the effect of water stress on canopy photosynthesis. A direct effect on single leaves may have closed stomata, increased mesophyll resistance, or decreased Hill reaction activity. Additionally, there was the long‐term effect of reduced leaf growth, which produced a canopy consisting mainly of old, less photosynthetically efficient leaves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on data from these facilities, al -gorithms were developed to improve the model's functionality and accuracy of simulation results (Marani et al., 1985; Reddy et al., 1993, 1995, 1997a,b, 2000, 2001, 2003).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Marani et al., 1985
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Marani, A., Baker, D. N., Reddy, V. R., & McKinion, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- ORCID
- Reddy, V. R.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 798-802
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2028669780
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Keywords
- water stress, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, canopy senescence, carbon exchange rate, canopy photosynthesis, leaf water potential, stomatal closure, mesophyll resistance, leaf area, plant height, vegetative growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review