Cited by 85Genetics and Plant BreedingGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Triple Testcross Analysis to Detect Epistasis in Maize

Wolf, Duane P., Hallauer, Arnel R.·1997·Crop Science

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) breeders have successfully exploited heterosis by crossing inbred lines to develop hybrids. Epistatic effects can contribute to the expression of heterosis for specific hybrids. The hybrid B73 × Mo17 was a widely grown hybrid with exceptional performance in the central U.S. Corn Belt during the late 1970s and early 1980s. The objective of this study was to determine if epistatic effects contribute significantly to the performance of B73 × Mo17. With use of the triple testcross design, 100 random F2 plants from B73 × Mo17 were testcrossed to B73, Mo17, and their F1. The 300 testcrosses were evaluated at three locations in 1992 and two locations in 1993. Triple testcross analysis suggested that epistatic effects were important for ear length, number of kernel rows, ear height, and flowering traits. In the analysis of variance, additive by additive effects were not significant for grain yield, whereas additive by dominance and dominance by dominance effects were significant. The additive by additive by environment interaction was more important than additive by additive effects per se for grain yield. Epistatic deviations from the comparison of testcross means suggest that B73 had favorable additive by additive effects for grain yield, barren plants, kernel‐row number, ear height, and silk delay. Inbred Mo17 had favorable additive by additive effects for ear length. The presence of significant positive epistatic effects may have contributed to the expression…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700030012x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wolf, D. P., & Hallauer, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Golden Harvest Research R.R. 2, Box 204 Nevada IA 50201
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hallauer, Arnel R.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-05
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
763-770
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W1995925807
Cited by
85
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crop Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
epistasis, maize, heterosis, grain yield, ear length, kernel row number, ear height, flowering characteristics, inbred lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review