Cited by 412Crop Yield and Soil FertilityAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement

Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation.

Sinclair, Thomas R.·1998·Crop Science

Abstract

Plant harvest index, the ratio of grain weight to total plant weight, is an important trait associated with the dramatic increases in crop yields that have occurred in the twentieth century. Harvest index reflects the partitioning of photosynthate between the grain and the vegetative plant and improvements in harvest index emphasize the importance of carbon allocation in grain production. The objective of this review is to examine from an historical perspective some of the changes that have occurred in crop harvest index and to consider the importance of crop nitrogen accumulations asociated with changing this trait. In modern times, harvest index has generally increased. Priort o the twentieth century,t here is evidencet hat plants elections also resulted in changes in harvest index. One factor that may have influenced these changes was the relative value of grain, compared with straw. Historically, straw production was a high priority, making low harvest index a desirable trait. Another factor wast he level of nitrogena vailabilef or the productionof highg rain yields. Accumulation of high levels of nitrogen is essential for high grain yields, and thus, high levels of nitrogen are commonly associated with crops having high harvest indices. Under conditions where nitrogen is limiting, a low harvest index crop is advantageous. Limited nitrogen can be partitioned into the low nitrogen concentration vegetative tissue, which results in high total production of plant mass. However, increasing grain yield and crop harvest index with high nitrogen grain requires a concomitant increase in crop nitrogen accumulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800030002x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plant breeders have already pushed εi and εp near their theoretical upper limits in highly productive crops in the best years.

    “Of the three efficiencies, plant breeders have already pushed 𝜀i and 𝜀p near their theoretical upper limits in highly productive crops in the best years (Evans, 1993; Hay, 1995; Sinclair, 1998).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinclair, T. R.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, Thomas R.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
638-643
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2080428535
Cited by
412
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
21.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crop Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Keywords
harvest index, grain yield, carbon allocation, nitrogen limitation, grain nitrogen content, grain yield improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review