The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index
Abstract
Drought is common in tropical environments, and selection for drought tolerance is one way of reducing the impacts of water deficit on crop yield. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate biomass, grain yield, and harvest index of maize (Zea mays L.) populations selected for drought tolerance. Three late‐maturing tropical maize populations were subjected to three cycles of S1 recurrent selection (‘La Posta Sequía’ and ‘Pool 26 Sequıa’ ) or eight cycles of full‐sib recurrent selection (‘Tuxpeño Sequía’) for yield and traits indicative of drought tolerance during flowering and grain filling. Selection gains were assessed in five trials conducted under mid–late season drought and in five trials conducted under well‐watered conditions. In water‐stressed environments, with average yields of 1.0 to 4.5 Mg ha−1, yield gains averaged 0.26 Mg ha−1 (12.6%) cycle−1 for La Posta Sequía and Pool 26 Sequía and 0.08 Mg ha−1 (3.8%) cycle−1 for Tuxpeño Sequía. In well‐watered conditions, where mean yields ranged from 5.8 to 10.4 Mg ha−1, corresponding gains per cycle were 0.12 Mg ha−1 (1.5%) and 0.04 Mg ha−1 (0.5%). Total biomass was unaffected by selection. Mean correlated responses to selection observed under drought were −0.11 Mg ha−1 cycle−1 in stem biomass and 0.025 cycle−1 in harvest index (HI), and under well‐watered conditions, 0.005 cycle−1 in HI. Stem biomass and HI were negatively correlated under drought Improved drought tolerance was attributed to simultaneous selection in well‐watered environments and under carefully managed water stress at flowering, resulting in greater partitioning of biomass to the ear and increased harvest index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic Improvement of Maize Yields
Russell, W. A. (1991) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60582-9 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Long‐Term Selection in a Commercial Hybrid Maize Breeding Program
Duvick, D. N., Smith, J. S. C., & Cooper, M. (2003) · Plant Breeding Reviews · doi:10.1002/9780470650288.ch4 · Cited by 502
Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa
Bänziger, M., Setimela, P. S., Hodson, D., & Vivek, B. (2006) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.014 · Cited by 300
Self-citationPrognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops
Hall, A. J., & Richards, R. A. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.014 · Cited by 295
Chenu, K., Chapman, S. C., Tardieu, F., McLean, G., Welcker, C., & Hammer, G. L. (2009) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.105429 · Cited by 237
Self-citationEvaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects
Chapman, S., Cooper, M., Podlich, D., & Hammer, G. (2003) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2003.0099 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Edmeades, G. O., Bolaños, J., Chapman, S. C., Lafitte, H. R., & Bänziger, M.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1306-1315
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2087632331
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951306x
- The paper
- Edmeades, G. O., Bolaños, J., Chapman, S. C., Lafitte, H. R., & Bänziger, M. (1999). Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951306x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.