Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index

Edmeades, G.O., Bolaños, J., Chapman, S.C., Lafitte, H.R., Bänziger, M.·1999·Crop Science

Abstract

Drought is common in tropical environments, and selection for drought tolerance is one way of reducing the impacts of water deficit on crop yield. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate biomass, grain yield, and harvest index of maize (Zea mays L.) populations selected for drought tolerance. Three late‐maturing tropical maize populations were subjected to three cycles of S1 recurrent selection (‘La Posta Sequía’ and ‘Pool 26 Sequıa’ ) or eight cycles of full‐sib recurrent selection (‘Tuxpeño Sequía’) for yield and traits indicative of drought tolerance during flowering and grain filling. Selection gains were assessed in five trials conducted under mid–late season drought and in five trials conducted under well‐watered conditions. In water‐stressed environments, with average yields of 1.0 to 4.5 Mg ha−1, yield gains averaged 0.26 Mg ha−1 (12.6%) cycle−1 for La Posta Sequía and Pool 26 Sequía and 0.08 Mg ha−1 (3.8%) cycle−1 for Tuxpeño Sequía. In well‐watered conditions, where mean yields ranged from 5.8 to 10.4 Mg ha−1, corresponding gains per cycle were 0.12 Mg ha−1 (1.5%) and 0.04 Mg ha−1 (0.5%). Total biomass was unaffected by selection. Mean correlated responses to selection observed under drought were −0.11 Mg ha−1 cycle−1 in stem biomass and 0.025 cycle−1 in harvest index (HI), and under well‐watered conditions, 0.005 cycle−1 in HI. Stem biomass and HI were negatively correlated under drought Improved drought tolerance was attributed to simultaneous selection in well‐watered environments and under carefully managed water stress at flowering, resulting in greater partitioning of biomass to the ear and increased harvest index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci1999.3951306x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Edmeades, G. O., Bolaños, J., Chapman, S. C., Lafitte, H. R., & Bänziger, M.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1306-1315
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2087632331
Cited by
303
References
1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951306x
The paper
Edmeades, G. O., Bolaños, J., Chapman, S. C., Lafitte, H. R., & Bänziger, M. (1999). Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951306x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.