The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: II. Direct and Correlated Responses among Secondary Traits
Abstract
Recurrent selection for drought tolerance for three to eight cycles has increased grain yield (GY) under drought at flowering by 30 to 50% in three lowland tropical maize (Zea mays L.) populations. The relationships among secondary traits as a result of this selection have not been determined, however. The objectives of this study were to measure direct and correlated changes due to selection in secondary traits by evaluating cycles of selection and appropriate check entries at five water‐stressed (mean yield 2.35, range 1.01–4.48 Mg ha−1) and five well‐watered environments (mean yield 7.96, range 5.81–10.40 Mg ha−1). Under drought, changes per cycle with recurrent S 1 selection (P < 0.05) were as follows: GY 12.6%, fertile ears per plant (EPP) 8.9%, grains per fertile ear (GPE) 6.3%, grain number per square meter 12.2%, 1000 grain weight no change, anthesis‐silking interval (ASI) −22.0%, days from sowing to 50% anthesis −0.7%, plant height −2.0%, primary tassel branch number −5.9%, and senesced leaf area 2.7%. Responses under well‐watered conditions were smaller but generally of the same sign. Grain yield was strongly associated with grain number per square meter in both water‐stressed and well‐watered environments Grain yield, EPP, and GPE were strongly correlated with ASI across entries under drought , though not when water was plentiful. The use of managed stress environments that consistently reveal genetic variation for these traits at specific times during crop development is endorsed for selection purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Borrás, L., Slafer, G. A., & Otegui, M. E. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.002 · Cited by 874
Hammer, G. L., Dong, Z., McLean, G., Doherty, A., Messina, C., Schussler, J., Zinselmeier, C., Paszkiewicz, S., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152 · Cited by 745
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Long‐Term Selection in a Commercial Hybrid Maize Breeding Program
Duvick, D. N., Smith, J. S. C., & Cooper, M. (2003) · Plant Breeding Reviews · doi:10.1002/9780470650288.ch4 · Cited by 502
Seed biology and yield of grain crops
(2017) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780647708.0000 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, S. C., & Edmeades, G. O.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1315-1324
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W137480676
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: II. Direct and Correlated Responses among Secondary Traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951315x
- The paper
- Chapman, S. C., & Edmeades, G. O. (1999). Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: II. Direct and Correlated Responses among Secondary Traits. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951315x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.