The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grain Yield of Rice Cultivars and Lines Developed in the Philippines since 1966
Open accessAbstract
Genetic improvement in grain yield has been intensively studied in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Such information is limited in rice (Oryza sativa L.). The objective of this study was to determine the trend in the yield of rice cultivars–lines developed since 1966. Twelve cultivars–lines were grown at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) farm and the Philippine Rice Research Institute farm during the dry season of 1996. Seven cultivars–lines were grown at IRRI farm in the dry season of 1998. Growth analyses were performed at key growth stages, and yield and yield components were determined at physiological maturity. Regression analysis of yield versus year of release indicated an annual gain in rice yield of 75 to 81 kg ha−1, equivalent to 1% per year. The highest yields obtained with the most recently released cultivars was 9 to 10 Mg ha−1, which is equivalent to reported yields of IR8 and other early IRRI cultivars obtained in the late 1960s and early 1970s at these same sites. Therefore, the 1% annual increase in yield may not represent genetic gain in yield potential. The increasing trend in yield of cultivars released before 1980 was mainly due to the improvement in harvest index (HI), while an increase in total biomass was associated with yield trends for cultivars–lines developed after 1980. Results suggest that further increases in rice yield potential will likely occur through increasing biomass production rather than increasing HI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes.
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L., & Taylor, M. (1980) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600028665 · Cited by 805
Cited by
Enhancing Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crop Plants
Fageria, N. K., & Baligar, V. C. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(05)88004-6 · Cited by 1,436
What it will take to Feed 5.0 Billion Rice consumers in 2030
Khush, G. S. (2005) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-005-2159-5 · Cited by 1,424
Self-citationPeng, S., Cassman, K. G., Virmani, S. S., Sheehy, J., & Khush, G. S. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961552x · Cited by 667
Self-citationHow extensive are yield declines in long-term rice–wheat experiments in Asia?
Ladha, J. K., Dawe, D., Pathak, H., Padre, A. T., Yadav, R. L., Singh, B., Singh, Y., Singh, Y., Singh, P., Kundu, A. L., et al. (2003) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(02)00219-8 · Cited by 615
The Role of Nutrient Efficient Plants in Improving Crop Yields in the Twenty First Century
Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., & Li, Y. C. (2008) · Journal of Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1080/01904160802116068 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, S., Laza, R. C., Visperas, R. M., Sanico, A. L., Cassman, K. G., & Khush, G. S.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-314
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1976313838
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grain Yield of Rice Cultivars and Lines Developed in the Philippines since 1966. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2000.402307x
- The paper
- Peng, S., Laza, R. C., Visperas, R. M., Sanico, A. L., Cassman, K. G., & Khush, G. S. (2000). Grain Yield of Rice Cultivars and Lines Developed in the Philippines since 1966. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402307x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.