Cited by 1,977Genetics and Plant BreedingAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

Cultivar Evaluation and Mega‐Environment Investigation Based on the GGE Biplot

Yan, Weikai, Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Qinglai, Szlavnics, Zorka·2000·Crop Science

Abstract

Cultivar evaluation and mega‐environment identification are among the most important objectives of multi‐environment trials (MET). Although the measured yield is a combined result of effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and genotype × environment interaction (GE), only G and GE are relevant to cultivar evaluation and mega‐environment identification. This paper presents a GGE (i.e., G + GE) biplot, which is constructed by the first two symmetrically scaled principal components (PC1 and PC2) derived from singular value decomposition of environment‐centered MET data. The GGE biplot graphically displays G plus GE of a MET in a way that facilitates visual cultivar evaluation and mega‐environment identification. When applied to yield data of the 1989 through 1998 Ontario winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) performance trials, the GGE biplots clearly identified yearly winning genotypes and their winning niches. Collective analysis of the yearly biplots suggests two winter wheat mega‐environments in Ontario: a minor mega‐environment (eastern Ontario) and a major one (southern and western Ontario), the latter being traditionally divided into three subareas. There were frequent crossover GE interactions within the major mega‐environment but the location groupings were variable across years. It therefore could not be further divided into meaningful subareas. It was revealed that in most years PC1 represents a proportional cultivar response across locations, which leads to noncross…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Yan, Weikai
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
597-605
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2040727185
Cited by
1,977
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 66
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crop Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
GGE biplot, gene-environment interaction, cultivar evaluation, winter wheat, wheat, multi-environment trials, singular value decomposition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review