Morphological and Physiological Characteristics Associated with Heat Tolerance in Creeping Bentgrass
Abstract
Growth of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) is limited by heat stress during summer. Understanding the morphological and physiological characteristics associated with heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass would facilitate breeding programs in improving those characteristics. The objectives of this experiment were to study responses of single‐leaf photosynthetic capacity, tillering, and root growth to heat stress for two creeping bentgrass cultivars differing in performance under heat stress and to determine the relative importance of these factors in heat tolerance. The cultivars L‐93 (heat tolerant) and Penncross (heat sensitive) were exposed to day/night temperatures of 20/15°C (control) and 35/30°C (heat stress) in growth chambers. Canopy net photosynthetic rate (Pn), single‐leaf Pn, and RuBP carboxylase (Rubisco) activity were reduced by heat stress for both cultivars. Canopy Pn of L‐93 was significantly higher (more than double at 64 d of treatment) than that of Penncross under heat stress. Cultivars were not different in single‐leaf Pn and Rubisco activity under either control or heat stress conditions. High temperature reduced plant density, tiller density, root number, and root fresh weight for both cultivars. L‐93 had higher plant and tiller densities, greater root to tiller ratio, and more and finer roots than Penncross under control and high temperature conditions. The better performance of L‐93 under heat stress was due largely to its morphological characteristics, including tillering and root growth, but was not related to single‐leaf photosynthetic capacity. Narrow leaves, small plants, dense tillers, big root system, and high root‐to‐shoot ratio could be used to select heat tolerant cultivars.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies report little or no association of PN with heat tolerance in potato and creeping bentgrass.
“Although the above reports (Table 1) suggest that photosynthetic rate could be used as a potential indicator of heat tolerance, there are other studies reporting little or no association of this physiological trait with heat tolerance, e.g., in potato (Solanum tuberosum) (Thornton et al. 1996) and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris) (Xu and Huang 2001), no positive association of P N was”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Xu and Huang 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2013) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xu, Q., & Huang, B.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Bingru
- ORCID
- Huang, Bingru
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-133
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2095245195
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Keywords
- creeping bentgrass, Agrostis palustris, heat tolerance, heat stress, photosynthetic capacity, Rubisco activity, tillering, root growth, cultivar comparison, turfgrass breeding, leaf morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review