The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a Saturated Molecular Genetic Linkage Map for Cultivated Sunflower
Abstract
The density and utility of the molecular genetic linkage map of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) has been greatly increased by the development and mapping of several hundred simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Of 1089 public SSR markers described thus far, 408 have been mapped in a recombinant inbred line (RIL) mapping population (RHA280 × RHA801). The goal of the present research was to increase the density of the sunflower map by constructing a new RIL map (PHA × PHB) based on SSRs, adding loci for newly developed SSR markers to the RHA280 × RHA801 RIL map, and integrating the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and SSR maps of sunflower. The latter was accomplished by adding 120 SSR marker loci to a backbone of 80 RFLP marker loci on the HA370 × HA372 F2 map. The map spanned 1275.4 centimorgans (cM) and had a mean density of 6.3 cM per locus. The PHA × PHB SSR map was constructed from 264 SSR marker loci, spanned 1199.4 cM, and had a mean density of 4.5 cM per locus. The RHA280 × RHA801 map was constructed by adding 118 new SSR and insertion–deletion (INDEL) marker loci to 459 previously mapped SSR marker loci. The 577-locus map spanned 1423.0 cM and had a mean density of 2.5 cM per locus. The three maps were constructed from 1044 DNA marker loci (701 unique SSR and 89 unique RFLP or INDEL marker loci) and supply a dense genome-wide framework of sequence-based DNA markers for molecular breeding and genomics research in sunflower.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Loridon, K., McPhee, K., Morin, J., Dubreuil, P., Pilet-Nayel, M. L., Aubert, G., Rameau, C., Baranger, A., Coyne, C., Lejeune-Hènaut, I., et al. (2005) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0014-3 · Cited by 260
Chromosomal Evolution and Patterns of Introgression in Helianthus
Barb, J. G., Bowers, J. E., Renaut, S., Rey, J. I., Knapp, S. J., Rieseberg, L. H., & Burke, J. M. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.165548 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J.-K., Tang, S., Slabaugh, M. B., Heesacker, A., Cole, G., Herring, M., Soper, J., Han, F., Chu, W.-C., Webb, D. M., Thompson, L., Edwards, K. J., Berry, S., Leon, A. J., Grondona, M., Olungu, C., Maes, N., & Knapp, S. J.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 367
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2068178165
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a Saturated Molecular Genetic Linkage Map for Cultivated Sunflower. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2003.0367
- The paper
- Yu, J.-K., Tang, S., Slabaugh, M. B., Heesacker, A., Cole, G., Herring, M., Soper, J., Han, F., Chu, W.-C., Webb, D. M., Thompson, L., Edwards, K. J., Berry, S., Leon, A. J., Grondona, M., Olungu, C., Maes, N., & Knapp, S. J. (2003). Towards a Saturated Molecular Genetic Linkage Map for Cultivated Sunflower. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
