The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data
Jarquín, D., Crossa, J., Lacaze, X., Du Cheyron, P., Daucourt, J., Lorgeou, J., Piraux, F., Guerreiro, L., Pérez, P., Calus, M., et al. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2243-1 · Cited by 687
Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J.-M., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00044 · Cited by 539
“Using a simple regression model, the slope for the regression of the genotypic means on a genetic predictor defined by the number of M1 alleles corresponds to the effect of a substitution of an m1 allele by an M1 allele at the given locus (Lynch and Walsh, 1998; Bernardo, 2002).”
MethodHybrid breeding in autogamous cereals
Longin, C. F. H., Mühleisen, J., Maurer, H. P., Zhang, H., Gowda, M., & Reif, J. C. (2012) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1967-7 · Cited by 305
Combs, E., & Bernardo, R. (2013) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2012.11.0030 · Cited by 208
Smith, A. B., Ganesalingam, A., Kuchel, H., & Cullis, B. R. (2015) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2412-x · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Udall, J. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1578-1579
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1975384294
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2003.1578
- The paper
- Udall, J. A. (2003). Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
