The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiological Processes Associated with Wheat Yield Progress in the UK
Abstract
Knowledge of the changes in physiological traits associated with genetic gains in yield potential is essential to improve understanding of yield‐limiting factors and to inform future breeding strategies. Our objective was to identify physiological traits associated with genetic gains in grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the UK. The growth and development of eight representative cultivars introduced from 1972 to 1995 (one tall rht‐D1b cultivar and seven Rht‐D1b, formerly Rht2, semidwarf cultivars) was examined in field experiments at Sutton Bonington in 1996–1997, 1997–1998, and 1998–1999. A linear genetic gain in grain yield of 0.12 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (1.2% yr−1) was positively correlated with both harvest index (HI) and aboveground biomass; a quadratic function fitted to the data showed that progress in HI was most apparent during the earlier phase of the 23‐yr period, whereas biomass contributed most since about 1983. There was a linear increase across time of 217 grains m−2 yr−1, but no change in grain weight. Significant genetic changes across time and correlations with grain yield were also found for preanthesis radiation‐use efficiency (RUE, 0.012 g MJ−1 yr−1) and water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content of stems and leaf sheaths at anthesis (4.6 g m−2 yr−1). Our results suggest that recent genetic gains in grain yield have been based on a combination of improved growth rate in the preanthesis period, which has driven increases in number of grains per square meter, and a larger source for grain filling through increases in stem soluble carbohydrate reserves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887
Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes.
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L., & Taylor, M. (1980) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600028665 · Cited by 805
Cited by
De Vita, P., Nicosia, O. L. D., Nigro, F., Platani, C., Riefolo, C., Di Fonzo, N., & Cattivelli, L. (2007) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.08.009 · Cited by 332
Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops
Hall, A. J., & Richards, R. A. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.014 · Cited by 295
Koester, R. P., Skoneczka, J. A., Cary, T. R., Diers, B. W., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru187 · Cited by 284
Babar, M. A., Reynolds, M. P., van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A. R., Raun, W. R., & Stone, M. L. (2006) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0211 · Cited by 275
Nitrogen and water-use efficiency of Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007
Sadras, V. O., & Lawson, C. (2013) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2012.11.008 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Shearman, V. J., Sylvester‐Bradley, R., Scott, R. K., & Foulkes, M. J.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-185
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W3016462847
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological Processes Associated with Wheat Yield Progress in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2005.0175a
- The paper
- Shearman, V. J., Sylvester‐Bradley, R., Scott, R. K., & Foulkes, M. J. (2005). Physiological Processes Associated with Wheat Yield Progress in the UK. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0175a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.