The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association Analysis as a Strategy for Improvement of Quantitative Traits in Plants
Abstract
Association analysis is a method potentially useful for detection of marker‐trait associations based on linkage disequilibrium, but little information is available on the application of this technique to plant breeding populations. With appropriate statistical methods, valid association analysis can be done in plant breeding populations; however, the most significant marker may not be closest to the functional gene. Bias can arise from (i) covariance among markers and QTL, frequently related to population structure or intense selection and (ii) differences in initial frequencies of marker alleles in the population, such that exclusive alleles tend to be in higher association. The potentials and limitations of germplasm bank collections, synthetic populations, and elite germplasm are compared, as experimental materials for association analysis integrated with plant breeding practice. Synthetics offer a favorable balance of power and precision for association analysis and would allow mapping of quantitative traits with increasing resolution through cycles of intermating. A model to describe the association between markers and genes as conditional probabilities in synthetic populations under recurrent selection is proposed, which can be computed on the basis of assumptions related to the history of the population. This model is useful for predicting the potential of different populations for association analysis and forecasting the response to marker‐assisted selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Metadata
- Authors
- Breseghello, F., & Sorrells, M. E.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1323-1330
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2084110906
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Analysis as a Strategy for Improvement of Quantitative Traits in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2005.09-0305
- The paper
- Breseghello, F., & Sorrells, M. E. (2006). Association Analysis as a Strategy for Improvement of Quantitative Traits in Plants. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.09-0305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.