The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship Between the Stay‐Green Trait and Grain Yield in Elite Sorghum Hybrids Grown in a Range of Environments
Abstract
The stay‐green drought adaptation mechanism has been widely promoted as a way of improving grain yield and lodging resistance in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and as a result has been the subject of many physiological and genetic studies. The relevance of these studies to elite sorghum hybrids is not clear given that they sample a limited number of environments and were conducted using inbred lines or relatively small numbers of experimental F 1 hybrids. In this study we investigated the relationship between stay‐green and yield using data from breeding trials that sampled 1668 unique hybrid combinations and 23 environments whose mean yields varied from 2.3 to 10.5 t ha−1. The strength and direction of the association between stay‐green and grain yield varied with both environment and genetic background (male tester). The majority of associations were positive, particularly in environments with yields below 6 t ha−1. As trial mean yield increased above 6 t ha−1 there was a trend toward an increased number of negative associations; however, the number and magnitude of the positive associations were larger. Given that post‐flowering drought is very commonly experienced by sorghum crops world wide and average yields are 1.2 and 2.5 t ha−1 for the world and Australia, respectively, our results indicate that selection for stay‐green in elite sorghum hybrids may be broadly beneficial for increasing yield in a wide range of environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Cited by
Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders?
Passioura, J. B. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12079 · Cited by 306
Crop adaptation to climate change as a consequence of long-term breeding
Snowdon, R. J., Wittkop, B., Chen, T.-W., & Stahl, A. (2021) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-020-03729-3 · Cited by 172
Sadras, V. O., Hayman, P. T., Rodriguez, D., Monjardino, M., Bielich, M., Unkovich, M., Mudge, B., & Wang, E. (2016) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp16027 · Cited by 142
Hammer, G. L., McLean, G., van Oosterom, E., Chapman, S., Zheng, B., Wu, A., Doherty, A., & Jordan, D. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20110 · Cited by 115
Self-citationBiological reality and parsimony in crop models—why we need both in crop improvement!
Hammer, G., Messina, C., Wu, A., & Cooper, M. (2019) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diz010 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordan, D. R., Hunt, C. H., Cruickshank, A. W., Borrell, A. K., & Henzell, R. G.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1153-1161
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2123479263
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship Between the Stay‐Green Trait and Grain Yield in Elite Sorghum Hybrids Grown in a Range of Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0326
- The paper
- Jordan, D. R., Hunt, C. H., Cruickshank, A. W., Borrell, A. K., & Henzell, R. G. (2012). The Relationship Between the Stay‐Green Trait and Grain Yield in Elite Sorghum Hybrids Grown in a Range of Environments. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.