The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois
Abstract
Successful soil quality assessment strategies are needed to improve our ability to manage soils sustainably. Our objective was to use a multivariate data set to determine whether recent adoption of no‐tillage (NT) practices had altered soil quality in Illinois. In 1995 and 1996, we sampled thirty‐six farm fields under conventional tillage (CT) or NT practices and relatively nondisturbed (ND) areas. Soils were Mollisols or Alfisols. Tillage or region affected 20 of the 23 parameters characterized. Soil chemical parameters were less variable than biological or physical measures. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assess soil quality overall. Principal component 1 (PC1) scores, which explained 39% of the total variance of the overall data set, were affected by tillage (ND > NT > CT) and increased with particulate and organic C and total N, biological activity, mineralizable N, and wet aggregate stability, and decreased with bulk density and dry aggregate mean weight diameter. The only significant factor contributing to PC2 was penetration resistance; PC2 explained 13% of the variance and decreased as follows: NT ≥ ND > CT. Multivariate assessment of soil quality indicated use of NT practices improved the biological and physical condition of the soil (0–15 cm) despite increased consolidation. It also showed that those biological and physical aspects of soils influenced by organic matter were the properties most altered by agronomic practices. Particulate organic matter (POM) was identified as a promising soil quality measure. A next step is to determine the biological and environmental relevance of a refined set of soil quality measures in conjunction with soil processes of regional concern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defining and Assessing Soil Quality
Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c1 · Cited by 2,176
Cited by
The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 · Cited by 1,341
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Mitchell, J. P. (2002) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00174-8 · Cited by 1,277
Karlen, D. L., Ditzler, C. A., & Andrews, S. S. (2003) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(03)00039-9 · Cited by 617
Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management
Andrews, S. S., & Carroll, C. R. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:dasqat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 506
The soil carbon dilemma: Shall we hoard it or use it?
Janzen, H. H. (2006) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.008 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- Wander, M. M., & Bollero, G. A.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 961-971
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1994952678
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1999.634961x
- The paper
- Wander, M. M., & Bollero, G. A. (1999). Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.634961x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.