The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Origin of the Theory of Mineral Nutrition of Plants and the Law of the Minimum
Open accessAbstract
Modern treatises on the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the Law of the Minimum usually refer to books published by Justus von Liebig in 1840 and 1855. These works are believed to be original reports of Liebig's own research. Occasionally, however, scholars of early agronomic literature have stated that these books by Liebig contain doctrines on mineral plant nutrition and nutrient deficiencies that had been published earlier by Liebig's countryman and colleague Carl Sprengel (1787–1859). To examine such statements, we studied the relevant literature. This study showed that the agronomist and chemist Carl Sprengel conducted pioneering research in agricultural chemistry during the first half of the 19th century. His early articles and books mark the beginning of a new epoch in agronomy. He published in 1826 an article in which the humus theory was refuted, and in 1828 another, extended journal article on soil chemistry and mineral nutrition of plants that contained in essence the Law of the Minimum. Sprengel's doctrines are presented again in the books published by Liebig in 1840 and 1855. To avoid a dispute on priorities and impacts and to recognize and commemorate the achievements of both pioneering scientists, the Association of German Agricultural Experimental and Research Stations has created the Sprengel‐Liebig Medal. We propose that the international community of agronomists acts similarly by recognizing Sprengel as a cofounder of agricultural chemistry and that the Law of the Minimum henceforth be called the Sprengel‐Liebig Law of the Minimum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Pest Risk Maps for Invasive Alien Species: A Roadmap for Improvement
Venette, R. C., Kriticos, D. J., Magarey, R. D., Koch, F. H., Baker, R. H. A., Worner, S. P., Gómez Raboteaux, N. N., McKenney, D. W., Dobesberger, E. J., Yemshanov, D., et al. (2010) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.5 · Cited by 334
Unified theory of Alzheimer’s disease (UTAD): implications for prevention and curative therapy
Nehls, M. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s40303-016-0018-8 · Cited by 41
Exploring the Use of the Environmental Productivity Index Concept for Crop Production and Modeling
Raja Reddy, K., Kakani, V. G., & Hodges, H. F. (2008) · Advances in Agricultural Systems Modeling · doi:10.2134/advagricsystmodel1.c13 · Cited by 28
Soil extractivism: Political ontology of soil erasure in the European Union's agricultural politics
Hokkanen, S. (2024) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103298 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Ploeg, R. R., Böhm, W., & Kirkham, M. B.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1055-1062
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2014591676
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Origin of the Theory of Mineral Nutrition of Plants and the Law of the Minimum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351055x
- The paper
- van der Ploeg, R. R., Böhm, W., & Kirkham, M. B. (1999). On the Origin of the Theory of Mineral Nutrition of Plants and the Law of the Minimum. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351055x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.