The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle‐Size Distribution
Abstract
We present a model to compute the hydraulic conductivity, K , as a function of water content, θ, directly from the particle‐size distribution (PSD) of a soil. The model is based on the assumption that soil pores can be represented by equivalent capillary tubes and that the water flow rate is a function of pore size. The pore‐size distribution is derived from the PSD using the Arya‐Paris model. Particle‐size distribution and K (θ) data for 16 soils, representing several textural classes, were used to relate the pore flow rate and the pore radius according to , where q i is the pore flow rate (cm 3 s −1 ) and r i is the pore radius (cm). Log c varied from about −2.43 to about 2.78, and x varied from ≈2.66 to ≈4.71. However, these parameters did not exhibit a systematic trend with textural class. The model was used to independently compute the K (θ) function, from the PSD data for 16 additional soils. The model predicted K (θ) values from near saturation to very low water contents. The agreement between the predicted and experimental K (θ) for individual samples ranged from excellent to poor, with the root mean square residuals (RMSR) of the log‐transformed K (θ) ranging from 0.616 to 1.603 for sand, from 0.592 to 1.719 for loam, and from 0.487 to 1.065 for clay. The average RMSR for all textures was 0.878.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media
Mualem, Y. (1976) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr012i003p00513 · Cited by 8,300
Cited by
Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., & van Genuchten, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00466-8 · Cited by 2,640
Self-citationGee, G. W., & Or, D. (2002) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12 · Cited by 964
Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0
Nemes, A., Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., & Wösten, J. H. M. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00465-6 · Cited by 440
Self-citationPredicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils: a review
Chapuis, R. P. (2012) · Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10064-012-0418-7 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Arya, L. M., Leij, F. J., Shouse, P. J., & van Genuchten, M. T.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1063-1070
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2009395936
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle‐Size Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351063x
- The paper
- Arya, L. M., Leij, F. J., Shouse, P. J., & van Genuchten, M. T. (1999). Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle‐Size Distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351063x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.