The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Macropore Networks in Undisturbed Soil Cores
Abstract
The role of macropores in soil and water processes has motivated many researchers to describe their sizes and shapes. Several approaches have been developed to characterize macroporosity, such as the use of tension infiltrometers, breakthrough curve techniques, image‐analysis of sections of soils, and CAT scanning. Until now, efforts to describe macropores in quantitative terms have been concentrated on their two‐dimensional (2‐D) geometry. The objective of this study is to nondestructively quantify the three‐dimensional (3‐D) properties of soil macropores in four large undisturbed soil columns. The geometry and topology of macropore networks were determined using CAT scanning and 3‐D reconstruction techniques. Our results suggest that the numerical density of macropores varies between 13421 to 23562 networks/m 3 of sandy loam soil. The majority of the macropore networks had a length of 40 mm, a volume of 60 mm 3 , and a wall area of 175 mm 2 It was found that the greater the length of networks, the greater the hydraulic radius. The inclination of the networks ranged from vertical to an angle of ≈55° from vertical. Results for tortuosity indicated that most macropore networks had a 3‐D tortuous length 15% greater than the distance between their extremities. More than 60% of the networks were made up of four branches. For Column 1, it was found that 82% of the networks had zero connectivity. This implies that more than 4/5 of the macropore networks were composed of only one independent path between any two points within the pore space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jarvis, N. J. (2007) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00915.x · Cited by 1,293
Macropores and water flow in soils revisited: REVIEW
Beven, K., & Germann, P. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20156 · Cited by 916
Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth
Lipiec, J., & Hatano, R. (2003) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(03)00097-1 · Cited by 551
Applications of X-ray computed tomography in the geosciences
Mees, F., Swennen, R., Geet, M. V., & Jacobs, P. (2003) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2003.215.01.01 · Cited by 542
Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil
Mooney, S. J., Pridmore, T. P., Helliwell, J., & Bennett, M. J. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1039-9 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Perret, J., Prasher, S. O., Kantzas, A., & Langford, C.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1530-1543
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2169383939
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Macropore Networks in Undisturbed Soil Cores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361530x
- The paper
- Perret, J., Prasher, S. O., Kantzas, A., & Langford, C. (1999). Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Macropore Networks in Undisturbed Soil Cores. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361530x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.