Flush of Carbon Dioxide Following Rewetting of Dried Soil Relates to Active Organic Pools
Abstract
Soil quality assessment could become more standardized with the development of a simple, rapid, and reliable method for quantifying potential soil biological activity. We evaluated the flush of CO 2 following rewetting of dried soil under standard laboratory conditions as a method to estimate an active organic matter fraction. The flush of CO 2 following rewetting of dried soil (3 d incubation at ≈50% water‐filled pore space and 25°C) was assessed for 20 soil series containing a wide range of organic C (20 ± 13 g kg −1 ) from Alberta–British Columbia, Maine, Texas, and Georgia. This flush of CO 2 explained 97% of the variability in cumulative C mineralization during , 86% of the variability in soil microbial biomass , and 67% of the variability in net N mineralization during Accounting for geographical differences in mean annual temperature and precipitation, which could affect soil organic matter quality, further improved relationships between the flush of CO 2 and active, passive, and total C and N pools. Measuring the flush of CO 2 following rewetting of dried soil may have value for routine soil testing of biological soil quality because it (i) is an incubation procedure patterned after natural occurrences in most soils, (ii) exhibits strong overall relationships with active organic pools, (iii) shows relatively minor changes in relationships with active organic pools that may be due to climatic variables, (iv) has a simple setup with minimal equipment requirements, and (…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2002) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(02)00018-1 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Self-citationJohn, I., Snapp, S., Nord, A., Chimonyo, V., Gwenambira, C., & Chikowo, R. (2021) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107585 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Grover, S., Anderson, H. M., Fleck, J., Kelly, C. N., Schuler, J., Ruark, M. D., & Freedman, Z. B. (2024) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.1002/saj2.20647 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Franzluebbers, A. J., Haney, R. L., Honeycutt, C. W., Schomberg, H. H., & Hons, F. M.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Franzluebbers, A. J.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 613-623
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2031809412
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- soil rewetting, soil organic carbon, soil biological activity, soil quality assessment, carbon mineralization, soil microbial biomass, nitrogen mineralization, soil organic matter quality, soil incubation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review