Cited by 412Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Unsaturated FlowSoil Science and Environmental Management

Flush of Carbon Dioxide Following Rewetting of Dried Soil Relates to Active Organic Pools

Franzluebbers, A. J., Haney, R. L., Honeycutt, C. W., Schomberg, H. H., Hons, F. M.·2000·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Soil quality assessment could become more standardized with the development of a simple, rapid, and reliable method for quantifying potential soil biological activity. We evaluated the flush of CO 2 following rewetting of dried soil under standard laboratory conditions as a method to estimate an active organic matter fraction. The flush of CO 2 following rewetting of dried soil (3 d incubation at ≈50% water‐filled pore space and 25°C) was assessed for 20 soil series containing a wide range of organic C (20 ± 13 g kg −1 ) from Alberta–British Columbia, Maine, Texas, and Georgia. This flush of CO 2 explained 97% of the variability in cumulative C mineralization during , 86% of the variability in soil microbial biomass , and 67% of the variability in net N mineralization during Accounting for geographical differences in mean annual temperature and precipitation, which could affect soil organic matter quality, further improved relationships between the flush of CO 2 and active, passive, and total C and N pools. Measuring the flush of CO 2 following rewetting of dried soil may have value for routine soil testing of biological soil quality because it (i) is an incubation procedure patterned after natural occurrences in most soils, (ii) exhibits strong overall relationships with active organic pools, (iii) shows relatively minor changes in relationships with active organic pools that may be due to climatic variables, (iv) has a simple setup with minimal equipment requirements, and (…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2000.642613x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franzluebbers, A. J., Haney, R. L., Honeycutt, C. W., Schomberg, H. H., & Hons, F. M.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Franzluebbers, A. J.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
613-623
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2031809412
Cited by
412
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
Keywords
soil rewetting, soil organic carbon, soil biological activity, soil quality assessment, carbon mineralization, soil microbial biomass, nitrogen mineralization, soil organic matter quality, soil incubation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review