Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,633

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil Structure and Organic Matter I. Distribution of Aggregate‐Size Classes and Aggregate‐Associated Carbon

Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., Combrink, C.·2000·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Cultivation reduces soil C content and changes the distribution and stability of soil aggregates. We investigated the effect of cultivation intensity on aggregate distribution and aggregate C in three soils dominated by 2:1 clay mineralogy and one soil characterized by a mixed (2:1 and 1:1) mineralogy. Each site had native vegetation (NV), no‐tillage (NT), and conventional tillage (CT) treatments. Slaked (i.e., air‐dried and fast‐rewetted) and capillary rewetted soils were separated into four aggregate‐size classes (<53, 53–250, 250–2000, and >2000 μm) by wet sieving. In rewetted soils, the proportion of macroaggregates accounted for 85% of the dry soil weight and was similar across management treatments. In contrast, aggregate distribution from slaked soils increasingly shifted toward more microaggregates and fewer macroaggregates with increasing cultivation intensity. In soils dominated by 2:1 clay mineralogy, the C content of macroaggregates was 1.65 times greater compared to microaggregates. These observations support an aggregate hierarchy in which microaggregates are bound together into macroaggregates by organic binding agents in 2:1 clay‐dominated soils. In the soil with mixed mineralogy, aggregate C did not increase with increasing aggregate size. At all sites, rewetted macro‐ and microaggregate C and slaked microaggregate C differed in the order NV > NT > CT. In contrast, slaked macroaggregate C concentration was similar across management treatments, except in the soil with mixed clay mineralogy. We conclude that increasing cultivation intensity leads to a loss of C‐rich macroaggregates and an increase of C‐depleted microaggregates in soils that express aggregate hierarchy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,633

Metadata

Authors
Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., & Combrink, C.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
681-689
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W1857591892
Cited by
1,633
References
2
FWCI
29.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Structure and Organic Matter I. Distribution of Aggregate‐Size Classes and Aggregate‐Associated Carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x
The paper
Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., & Combrink, C. (2000). Soil Structure and Organic Matter I. Distribution of Aggregate‐Size Classes and Aggregate‐Associated Carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.