Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved Prediction of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity with the Mualem‐van Genuchten Model

Schaap, Marcel G., Leij, Feike J.·2000·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

In many vadose zone hydrological studies, it is imperative that the soil's unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is known. Frequently, the Mualem–van Genuchten model (MVG) is used for this purpose because it allows prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from water retention parameters. For this and similar equations, it is often assumed that a measured saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K s ) can be used as a matching point ( K o ) while a factor S L e is used to account for pore connectivity and tortuosity (where S e is the relative saturation and ). We used a data set of 235 soil samples with retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data to test and improve predictions with the MVG equation. The standard practice of using and resulted in a root mean square error for log( K ) (RMSE K ) of 1.31. Optimization of the matching point ( K o ) and L to the hydraulic conductivity data yielded a RMSE K of 0.41. The fitted K o were, on average, about one order of magnitude smaller than measured K s Furthermore, L was predominantly negative, casting doubt that the MVG can be interpreted in a physical way. Spearman rank correlations showed that both K o and L were related to van Genuchten water retention parameters and neural network analyses confirmed that K o and L could indeed be predicted in this way. The corresponding RMSE K was 0.84, which was half an order of magnitude better than the traditional MVG model. Bulk density and textural parameters were poor predictors while addition of K s improved the RMSE K only marginally. Bootstrap analysis showed that the uncertainty in predicted unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was about one order of magnitude near saturation and larger at lower water contents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2000.643843x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Schaap, M. G., & Leij, F. J.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
843-851
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2007007319
Cited by
469
References
25
FWCI
58.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Prediction of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity with the Mualem‐van Genuchten Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2000.643843x
The paper
Schaap, M. G., & Leij, F. J. (2000). Improved Prediction of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity with the Mualem‐van Genuchten Model. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.643843x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.