The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long-Term Rice-Wheat Rotation in India
Abstract
Major improvements in the productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) have occurred in South Asia since 1965–1966 when the Green Revolution began. However, after the 1980s, yield stagnated or declined. We analyzed grain yield trends, soil C, N, P, and K status, and P and K balances in a 14-yr rice–wheat experiment conducted at Punjab, India with 11 treatments comprised of various combinations of inorganic and organic sources of nutrients. Recommended levels of N, P, and K were supplemented with N through farmyard manure (FYM), wheat chopped straw (WCS), or sesbania (Sesbania cannabina Linn. & Merrill). Soil parameters were analyzed in archived soil samples collected periodically from 1988 to 1999. Rice yield declines ranged from 0.07 to 0.13 Mg ha−1 yr−1 dependent on treatment. Wheat yields declined by 0.04 Mg ha−1 yr−1 with applications of 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer but were maintained over the 14-yr period in the other treatments. Total soil N and available P and K declined in all the treatments except with FYM, in which total N was maintained and available P increased. Total soil C was either maintained or increased with time. Nitrogen and K depletion may have collectively contributed to the yield decline. Stable wheat yields may have been because of continuing variety improvement, resulting in higher harvest index (HI). Results show that current fertilizer recommendations are inadequate for maintaining yields. This cropping system may not be sustainable without increased K input to maintain soil K above sufficiency levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aggarwal, P. K., Kropff, M. J., Cassman, K. G., & ten Berge, H. F. M. (1997) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(96)01044-1 · Cited by 97
Cited by
Liu, E., Yan, C., Mei, X., He, W., Bing, S. H., Ding, L., Liu, Q., Liu, S., & Fan, T. (2010) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.029 · Cited by 809
How extensive are yield declines in long-term rice–wheat experiments in Asia?
Ladha, J. K., Dawe, D., Pathak, H., Padre, A. T., Yadav, R. L., Singh, B., Singh, Y., Singh, Y., Singh, P., Kundu, A. L., et al. (2003) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(02)00219-8 · Cited by 615
Self-citationMulvaney, R. L., Khan, S. A., & Ellsworth, T. R. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0527 · Cited by 522
Manna, M. C., Swarup, A., Wanjari, R. H., Ravankar, H. N., Mishra, B., Saha, M. N., Singh, Y. V., Sahi, D. K., & Sarap, P. A. (2005) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.006 · Cited by 441
Sustainability issues on rice–wheat cropping system
Bhatt, R., Kukal, S. S., Busari, M. A., Arora, S., & Yadav, M. (2016) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhandari, A. L., Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H., Padre, A. T., Dawe, D., & Gupta, R. K.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1989120713
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long-Term Rice-Wheat Rotation in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2002.0162
- The paper
- Bhandari, A. L., Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H., Padre, A. T., Dawe, D., & Gupta, R. K. (2002). Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long-Term Rice-Wheat Rotation in India. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.