The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tillage, Nitrogen, and Cropping System Effects on Soil Carbon Sequestration
Abstract
Soil C sequestration can improve soil quality and reduce agriculture's contribution to CO2 emissions. The long-term (12 yr) effects of tillage system and N fertilization on crop residue production and soil organic C (SOC) sequestration in two dryland cropping systems in North Dakota on a loam soil were evaluated. An annual cropping (AC) rotation [spring wheat (SW) (Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat (WW)–sunflower (SF) (Helianthus annuus L.)] and a spring wheat-fallow (SW-F) rotation were studied. Tillage systems included conventional-till (CT), minimum-till (MT), and no-till (NT). Nitrogen rates were 34, 67, and 101 kg N ha−1 for the AC system and 0, 22, and 45 kg N ha−1 for the SW-F system. Total crop residue returned to the soil was greater with AC than with SW-F. As tillage intensity decreased, SOC sequestration increased (NT > MT > CT) in the AC system but not in the SW-F system. Fertilizer N increased crop residue quantity returned to the soil, but generally did not increase SOC sequestration in either cropping system. Soil bulk density decreased with increasing tillage intensity in both systems. The results suggest that continued use of a crop-fallow farming system, even with NT, may result in loss of SOC. With NT, an estimated 233 kg C ha−1 was sequestered each year in AC system, compared with 25 kg C ha−1 with MT and a loss of 141 kg C ha−1 with CT. Conversion from crop-fallow to more intensive cropping systems utilizing NT will be needed to have a positive impact on reducing CO2 loss from croplands in the northern Great Plains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Management effects on soil C storage on the Canadian prairies
Janzen, H. H., Campbell, C. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Ellert, B. H., Juma, N., McGill, W. B., & Zentner, R. P. (1998) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00105-6 · Cited by 411
Cited by
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 · Cited by 1,531
Lal, R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2185 · Cited by 1,413
Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation
Stewart, C. E., Paustian, K., Conant, R. T., Plante, A. F., & Six, J. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0 · Cited by 911
Six, J., Ogle, S. M., Jay breidt, F., Conant, R. T., Mosier, A. R., & Paustian, K. (2004) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00730.x · Cited by 878
Metadata
- Authors
- Halvorson, A. D., Wienhold, B. J., & Black, A. L.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 906-906
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986319286
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tillage, Nitrogen, and Cropping System Effects on Soil Carbon Sequestration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2002.0906
- The paper
- Halvorson, A. D., Wienhold, B. J., & Black, A. L. (2002). Tillage, Nitrogen, and Cropping System Effects on Soil Carbon Sequestration. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0906
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.