The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Reflectance Spectral Libraries for Characterization of Soil Properties
Abstract
Methods for rapid estimation of soil properties are needed for quantitative assessments of land management problems. We developed a scheme for development and use of soil spectral libraries for rapid nondestructive estimation of soil properties based on analysis of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. A diverse library of over 1000 archived topsoils from eastern and southern Africa was used to test the approach. Air-dried soils were scanned using a portable spectrometer (0.35–2.5 μm) with an artificial light source. Soil properties were calibrated to soil reflectance using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and screening tests were developed for various soil fertility constraints using classification trees. A random sample of one-third of the soils was withheld for validation purposes. Validation r2 values for regressions were: exchangeable Ca, 0.88; effective cation-exchange capacity (ECEC), 0.88; exchangeable Mg, 0.81; organic C concentration, 0.80; clay content, 0.80; sand content, 0.76; and soil pH, 0.70. Validation likelihood ratios for diagnostic screening tests were: ECEC <4.0 cmolc kg−1, 10.8; pH <5.5, 5.6; potential N mineralization >4.1 mg kg−1 d−1, 2.9; extractable P <7 mg kg−1, 2.9; exchangeable K <0.2 cmolc kg−1, 2.6. We show the response of prediction accuracy to sample size and demonstrate how the predictive value of spectral libraries can be iteratively increased through detection of spectral outliers among new samples. The spectral library approach opens up new possibilities for modeling, assessment and management of risk in soil evaluations in agricultural, environmental, and engineering applications. Further research should test the use of soil reflectance in pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil functional attributes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v · Cited by 932
Cited by
Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science
Stenberg, B., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Mouazen, A. M., & Wetterlind, J. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)07005-7 · Cited by 1,549
Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity
Barrios, E. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004 · Cited by 1,067
Using the USLE: Chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling
Alewell, C., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., & Panagos, P. (2019) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004 · Cited by 804
Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective
Bastida, F., Zsolnay, A., Hernández, T., & García, C. (2008) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.08.007 · Cited by 730
Islam, K., Singh, B., & McBratney, A. (2003) · Australian Journal of Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr02137 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepherd, K. D., & Walsh, M.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 988-988
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142606975
- Cited by
- 1,025
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Reflectance Spectral Libraries for Characterization of Soil Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2002.0988
- The paper
- Shepherd, K. D., & Walsh, M. (2002). Development of Reflectance Spectral Libraries for Characterization of Soil Properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.