The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organic Phosphorus Composition and Potential Bioavailability in Semi‐Arid Arable Soils of the Western United States
Abstract
The organic P composition of semi‐arid arable soils is largely unknown, but such information is fundamental to understanding P dynamics in irrigated agriculture. We used solution 31 P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and phosphatase hydrolysis to characterize organic P in semi‐arid arable soils from the western USA (organic C 2.0–30.7 g C kg −1 soil, clay 2–48%, pH 5.2–8.2, CaCO 3 <1–480 g kg −1 soil). Total P concentrations ranged from 220 to 1210 mg P kg −1 soil, of which between 12 and 45% was extracted with NaOH–EDTA. Inorganic orthophosphate was the dominant P compound, but concentrations determined by solution 31 P NMR spectroscopy were consistently greater than those determined by molybdate colorimetry. Concentrations of organic P were relatively small, and were dominated by orthophosphate monoesters (11–130 mg P kg −1 soil), with smaller concentrations of orthophosphate diesters (0–7 mg P kg −1 soil). Pyrophosphate was present in almost all soils at concentrations up to 14 mg P kg −1 soil. Bicarbonate‐extractable organic P ranged from 1.7 to 22.8 mg P kg −1 soil, of which between 37 and 87% was hydrolyzed by phosphatase enzymes, suggesting its bioavailability. Soil organic P concentrations were positively correlated with mean annual precipitation, organic C, clay, and oxalate‐extractable metals (Al, Fe, Mn), and negatively correlated with mean annual temperature and soil pH. However, CaCO 3 concentrations were not significantly correlated with any soil property. These results indicate that equilibrium levels of organic P in semi‐arid arable soils are controlled by a balance between the physical protection offered by the soil matrix and the suitability of the environment for biological productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stable soil organic matter: A comparison of C:N:P:S ratios in Australian and other world soils
Kirkby, C. A., Kirkegaard, J. A., Richardson, A. E., Wade, L. J., Blanchard, C., & Batten, G. (2011) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.010 · Cited by 494
Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research: A review
Kruse, J., Abraham, M., Amelung, W., Baum, C., Bol, R., Kühn, O., Lewandowski, H., Niederberger, J., Oelmann, Y., Rüger, C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201400327 · Cited by 386
The spatial and temporal distribution of crop residue burning in the contiguous United States
McCarty, J. L., Korontzi, S., Justice, C. O., & Loboda, T. (2009) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.009 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, B. L., Cade-Menun, B. J., & Westermann, D. T.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1168-1179
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1988510724
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic Phosphorus Composition and Potential Bioavailability in Semi‐Arid Arable Soils of the Western United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2003.1168
- The paper
- Turner, B. L., Cade-Menun, B. J., & Westermann, D. T. (2003). Organic Phosphorus Composition and Potential Bioavailability in Semi‐Arid Arable Soils of the Western United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.