The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship between Carbon Input, Aggregation, and Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization in Sustainable Cropping Systems
Abstract
One of our current challenges is to quantify the mechanisms, capacity, and longevity of C stabilization in agricultural lands. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the long‐term (10 yr) role of C input in soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and to identify underlying mechanisms of C stabilization in soils. Carbon input and SOC sequestration, as governed by crop management strategies, were assessed across 10 Mediterranean cropping systems. Empirically derived relationships between yield and aboveground plus belowground crop biomass as well as estimates of C contributions from crop residues and manure amendments were used to quantify cumulative C inputs into each cropping system. Soil samples were separated into four aggregate size classes (>2000, 250–2000, 53–250, and <53 μm) and into three soil organic matter (SOM) fractions within the large (>2000 μm) and small (250–2000 μm) macroaggregates. Aggregate stability increased linearly with both C input ( r 2 = 0.75, p = 0.001) and SOC ( r 2 = 0.63, p = 0.006). Across the 10 cropping systems, annual soil C sequestration rates ranged from −0.35 to 0.56 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 We found a strong linear relationship ( r 2 = 0.70, p = 0.003) between SOC sequestration and cumulative C input, with a residue‐C conversion to SOC rate of 7.6%. This linear relationship suggests that these soils have not reached an upper limit of C sequestration (i.e., not C saturated). In addition, C shifted from the <53‐μm fraction in low C input systems to the large and small macroaggregates in high C input systems. A majority of the accumulation of SOC due to additional C inputs was preferentially sequestered in the microaggregates‐within‐small‐macroaggregates (mM). Hence, the mM fraction is an ideal indicator for C sequestration potential in sustainable agroecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Self-citation
Cited by
Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05035-170440 · Cited by 1,126
Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation
Stewart, C. E., Paustian, K., Conant, R. T., Plante, A. F., & Six, J. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0 · Cited by 911
Self-citationLal, R., Negassa, W., & Lorenz, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.002 · Cited by 580
The Nature and Longevity of Agricultural Impacts on Soil Carbon and Nutrients: A Review
McLauchlan, K. (2006) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0135-1 · Cited by 494
Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Gattinger, A., & Gimeno, B. S. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.003 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, A. Y. Y., Six, J., Bryant, D. C., Denison, R. F., & van Kessel, C.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1078-1085
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2022997529
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship between Carbon Input, Aggregation, and Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization in Sustainable Cropping Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2004.0215
- The paper
- Kong, A. Y. Y., Six, J., Bryant, D. C., Denison, R. F., & van Kessel, C. (2005). The Relationship between Carbon Input, Aggregation, and Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization in Sustainable Cropping Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.