Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 723

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship between Carbon Input, Aggregation, and Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization in Sustainable Cropping Systems

Kong, Angela Y. Y., Six, Johan, Bryant, Dennis C., Denison, R. Ford, van Kessel, Chris·2005·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

One of our current challenges is to quantify the mechanisms, capacity, and longevity of C stabilization in agricultural lands. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the long‐term (10 yr) role of C input in soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and to identify underlying mechanisms of C stabilization in soils. Carbon input and SOC sequestration, as governed by crop management strategies, were assessed across 10 Mediterranean cropping systems. Empirically derived relationships between yield and aboveground plus belowground crop biomass as well as estimates of C contributions from crop residues and manure amendments were used to quantify cumulative C inputs into each cropping system. Soil samples were separated into four aggregate size classes (>2000, 250–2000, 53–250, and <53 μm) and into three soil organic matter (SOM) fractions within the large (>2000 μm) and small (250–2000 μm) macroaggregates. Aggregate stability increased linearly with both C input ( r 2 = 0.75, p = 0.001) and SOC ( r 2 = 0.63, p = 0.006). Across the 10 cropping systems, annual soil C sequestration rates ranged from −0.35 to 0.56 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 We found a strong linear relationship ( r 2 = 0.70, p = 0.003) between SOC sequestration and cumulative C input, with a residue‐C conversion to SOC rate of 7.6%. This linear relationship suggests that these soils have not reached an upper limit of C sequestration (i.e., not C saturated). In addition, C shifted from the <53‐μm fraction in low C input systems to the large and small macroaggregates in high C input systems. A majority of the accumulation of SOC due to additional C inputs was preferentially sequestered in the microaggregates‐within‐small‐macroaggregates (mM). Hence, the mM fraction is an ideal indicator for C sequestration potential in sustainable agroecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2004.0215

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 723

Metadata

Authors
Kong, A. Y. Y., Six, J., Bryant, D. C., Denison, R. F., & van Kessel, C.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1078-1085
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2022997529
Cited by
723
References
2
FWCI
31.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship between Carbon Input, Aggregation, and Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization in Sustainable Cropping Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2004.0215
The paper
Kong, A. Y. Y., Six, J., Bryant, D. C., Denison, R. F., & van Kessel, C. (2005). The Relationship between Carbon Input, Aggregation, and Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization in Sustainable Cropping Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0215

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.