Cited by 250Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Root Growth and Nitrate Uptake of Three Different Catch Crops in Deep Soil Layers

Kristensen, H. L., Thorup-Kristensen, K.·2004·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Catch crops can reduce NO 3 losses from leaching, but little is known about the importance of deep rooting for the efficiency of NO 3 depletion. In a field experiment, we investigated the N uptake and root growth of three types of catch crops using minirhizotrons (glass tubes of 70‐mm o.d.) reaching 2.4 m. Our purpose was to evaluate minirhizotron methodology and the importance of deep rooting in the ability of catch crops to take up NO 3 from deep soil layers. Nitrogen uptake was studied over a 6‐d period at the end of October by injection of 15 NO 3 at four depths in the ranges: 0.4 to 1, 0.5 to 1.4, and 1 to 2.5 m under Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum Lam.), winter rye ( Secale cereale L.), and fodder radish ( Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers.), respectively. The root depth of the three species were 0.6, 1.1, and more than 2.4 m, respectively. No 15 N was taken up from placements below root depth, and linear relationships were found between root density and 15 N uptake from different depths. Residual soil NO 3 of 18, 59, and 87 kg N ha −1 was left under fodder radish, winter rye, and ryegrass, respectively. The measurements obtained with the minirhizotron method were highly relevant for evaluating N uptake from different soil layers, and root depths of the catch crops were important for N depletion. Knowledge about root growth and N uptake in deep soil layers may be utilized when designing crop rotations with improved N use efficiency. Where N has been left by a preceding crop and leached to deeper soil layers, it may be recycled by deep‐rooted catch crops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2004.5290

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kristensen, H. L., & Thorup-Kristensen, K.
Affiliations
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Dep. of Horticulture Kirstinebjergvej 10 DK‐5792 Årslev Denmark
Corresponding author
Kristensen, H. L.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
529-537
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2039353650
Cited by
250
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Statens Jordbrugs- og Veterinærvidenskabelige Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
catch crops, deep rooting, nitrate uptake, root growth, root depth, nitrate leaching, nitrogen starvation, minirhizotron, 15N tracer, Lolium multiflorum, winter rye, fodder radish, crop rotation, nitrogen use efficiency, residual soil nitrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review