Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon K‐Edge NEXAFS and FTIR‐ATR Spectroscopic Investigation of Organic Carbon Speciation in Soils

Solomon, Dawit, Lehmann, Johannes, Kinyangi, James, Liang, Biqing, Schäfer, Thorsten·2005·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) is a fundamental component of soil and the global C cycle. We used C (1s) near‐edge x‐ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and synchrotron‐based Fourier transform infrared‐attenuated total reflectance (FTIR‐ATR) spectroscopy to speciate C and investigate the influence of land use on the composition of SOM in the humic substances extracted from clay and silt fractions. Soil samples were collected from natural forest, tea and Cupressus plantations and cultivated fields in Ethiopia. Carbon K‐edge spectra revealed multiple C (1s) electron transitions in the fine structure of C NEXAFS region (284–290 eV) indicating the presence of aromatic‐C, phenolic‐C, aliphatic‐C, carboxylic‐C, and O‐alkyl‐C in the humic substances. It also exhibited good selectivity, where specific energy regions correspond to C in discrete functional groups. However, regions of slight overlap between 1s‐3p/σ* transition of aliphatic‐C and 1s‐π* transition of carboxylic‐C may not be excluded. Fourier transform infrared‐attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy showed larger proportions of aromatic‐C (25.5%, 21.9%) and asymmetric and symmetric aliphatic‐C (19.7%, 15.2%) groups in the silt than in clay, respectively. However, smaller proportion of polysaccharides (19.3%, 11.5%) was obtained from the silt compared with clay. The proportions of phenols (20.7%, 20.4%), aliphatic deformation of CH 2 or CH 3 (13.1%, 14.5%), and carboxylic (9.8%, 8.3%) groups were of similar magnitude in both fractions. The proportion of polysaccharides decreased in the order: natural forests > plantations > cultivated fields, while recalcitrant aromatic‐C increased in the order: natural forest < plantation < cultivation. Therefore, C (1s) NEXAFS and synchrotron‐based FTIR‐ATR spectroscopy are powerful, nondestructive techniques that can potentially be used not only to identify and fingerprint complex structural characteristics of organic C macromolecules but also to investigate the impact of long‐term anthropogenic management on the composition and biogeochemical cycling of organic C in terrestrial ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2005.0107dup

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Kinyangi, J., Liang, B., & Schäfer, T.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
107-119
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2031231590
Cited by
233
References
0
FWCI
19.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon K‐Edge NEXAFS and FTIR‐ATR Spectroscopic Investigation of Organic Carbon Speciation in Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2005.0107dup
The paper
Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Kinyangi, J., Liang, B., & Schäfer, T. (2005). Carbon K‐Edge NEXAFS and FTIR‐ATR Spectroscopic Investigation of Organic Carbon Speciation in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0107dup

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.