The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy
Abstract
Visible and near‐infrared (VNIR, 400–2500 nm) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a rapid, proximal‐sensing method that has proven useful in quantifying constituents of dried and ground soil samples. Very little is known, however, about how DRS performs in a field setting on soils scanned in situ. The overall goal of this research was to evaluate the feasibility of VNIR‐DRS for in situ quantification of clay content of soil from a variety of parent materials. Seventy‐two soil cores were obtained from six fields in Erath and Comanche counties, Texas. Each soil core was scanned with a visible near‐infrared spectrometer, with a spectral range of 350 to 2500 nm, at four different combinations of moisture content and pretreatment: field‐moist in situ, air‐dried in situ, field‐moist smeared in situ, and air‐dried ground. The VNIR spectra were used to predict total and fine clay content of the soil using partial least squares (PLS) regression. The PLS model was validated with 30% of the original soil cores that were randomly selected and not used in the calibration model. The validation clay predictions had a root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of 61 and 41 g kg −1 dry soil for the field‐moist and air‐dried in situ cores, respectively. The RMSD of the air‐dry ground samples was between the two in situ RMSDs and comparable to values in the literature. Smearing the samples increased the field‐moist in situ RMSD to 74 g kg −1 Whole‐field holdout validation results showed that soils from all parent materials need to be represented in the calibration samples for maximum predictability. In summary, DRS is an acceptable technique for rapidly measuring soil clay content in situ for various water contents and parent materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Islam, K., Singh, B., & McBratney, A. (2003) · Australian Journal of Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr02137 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science
Stenberg, B., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Mouazen, A. M., & Wetterlind, J. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)07005-7 · Cited by 1,549
Prediction of soil organic carbon for different levels of soil moisture using Vis-NIR spectroscopy
Nocita, M., Stevens, A., Noon, C., & van Wesemael, B. (2013) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.07.020 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Waiser, T. H., Morgan, C. L. S., Brown, D. J., & Hallmark, C. T.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 389-396
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2005460036
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2006.0211
- The paper
- Waiser, T. H., Morgan, C. L. S., Brown, D. J., & Hallmark, C. T. (2007). In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.