Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Waiser, Travis H., Morgan, Cristine L. S., Brown, David J., Hallmark, C. Tom·2007·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Visible and near‐infrared (VNIR, 400–2500 nm) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a rapid, proximal‐sensing method that has proven useful in quantifying constituents of dried and ground soil samples. Very little is known, however, about how DRS performs in a field setting on soils scanned in situ. The overall goal of this research was to evaluate the feasibility of VNIR‐DRS for in situ quantification of clay content of soil from a variety of parent materials. Seventy‐two soil cores were obtained from six fields in Erath and Comanche counties, Texas. Each soil core was scanned with a visible near‐infrared spectrometer, with a spectral range of 350 to 2500 nm, at four different combinations of moisture content and pretreatment: field‐moist in situ, air‐dried in situ, field‐moist smeared in situ, and air‐dried ground. The VNIR spectra were used to predict total and fine clay content of the soil using partial least squares (PLS) regression. The PLS model was validated with 30% of the original soil cores that were randomly selected and not used in the calibration model. The validation clay predictions had a root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of 61 and 41 g kg −1 dry soil for the field‐moist and air‐dried in situ cores, respectively. The RMSD of the air‐dry ground samples was between the two in situ RMSDs and comparable to values in the literature. Smearing the samples increased the field‐moist in situ RMSD to 74 g kg −1 Whole‐field holdout validation results showed that soils from all parent materials need to be represented in the calibration samples for maximum predictability. In summary, DRS is an acceptable technique for rapidly measuring soil clay content in situ for various water contents and parent materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2006.0211

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Waiser, T. H., Morgan, C. L. S., Brown, D. J., & Hallmark, C. T.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
389-396
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2005460036
Cited by
216
References
1
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2006.0211
The paper
Waiser, T. H., Morgan, C. L. S., Brown, D. J., & Hallmark, C. T. (2007). In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.