The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Some Indices of Potentially Mineralizable Nitrogen in Soil
Open accessAbstract
A series of soil N mineralization indices were evaluated using 153 samples chosen from arable fields representing a wide range of soil types, management practices, and climatic zones. These indices were compared against potentially mineralizable N (N 0 ) determined by aerobic incubation at 25°C for 24 wk. Three different pools of mineralizable N were recognized: Pool I, the mineralization flush on rewetting in the first 2 wk; Pool II, gross N mineralization in the next 22 wk; and Pool III, the potentially mineralizable N, predicted from the fitted curve, that did not mineralize during the incubation period. Pool I was highly correlated with CaCl 2 –N, KCl‐NH 4 , and KCl‐NO 3 , which extract soil mineral N. Pool III was significantly correlated with ultraviolet absorbance of NaHCO 3 extract at 205 and 260 nm (NaHCO 3 –205 and −260), Illinois soil N test, NaOH direct‐distillation N, and hot KCl‐NH 4 , which mostly extract hydrolyzable organic N. All indices except the mineral N based methods, phosphate‐borate buffer method, and microbial biomass C were significantly related to N 0 , which includes both Pools II and III. The NaHCO 3 –260, NaOH direct‐distillation N, and Illinois soil N test had the highest correlations with N 0 ( r 2 = 0.74, 0.61, and 0. 51, respectively). Total organic C and N represent long‐term changes in N 0 and were almost as effective in predicting N 0 as the other indices ( r 2 = 0.60 and 0.67, respectively); however, they would be expected to be less sensitive to short‐term changes in N 0 due to changes in soil management practices and history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mulvaney, R. L., Khan, S. A., & Ellsworth, T. R. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0527 · Cited by 522
Influence of biochar on nitrogen fractions in a coastal plain soil
Schomberg, H. H., Gaskin, J. W., Harris, K., Das, K. C., Novak, J. M., Busscher, W. J., Watts, D. W., Woodroof, R. H., Lima, I. M., Ahmedna, M., et al. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0133 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharifi, M., Zebarth, B. J., Burton, D. L., Grant, C. A., & Cooper, J. M.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1233-1239
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1976853818
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Some Indices of Potentially Mineralizable Nitrogen in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2006.0265
- The paper
- Sharifi, M., Zebarth, B. J., Burton, D. L., Grant, C. A., & Cooper, J. M. (2007). Evaluation of Some Indices of Potentially Mineralizable Nitrogen in Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.