Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Mechanism Study of Reflectance Spectroscopy for Investigating Heavy Metals in Soils

Wu, Yunzhao, Chen, Jun, Ji, Junfeng, Gong, Peng, Liao, Qilin, Tian, Qingjiu, Ma, Hongrui·2007·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Conventional methods for investigating heavy metal contamination in soil are time consuming and expensive. In this study, we (i) explored reflectance spectroscopy as an alternative method for assessing heavy metals, and (ii) further explored the physicochemical mechanism that allows estimation of heavy metals with the reflectance spectroscopy method. We first investigated the spectral response of changing concentrations of heavy metals in soils. The results indicated that only at very high concentration can transition elements exhibit their inherent absorption features. In spite of this observation, we successfully predicted low levels of heavy metals in agricultural soils. The best prediction accuracies were obtained for the siderophile elements Ni, Cr, and Co. The poorest prediction was for Cd. The order of prediction accuracy for metals was approximately the same as the order of their correlation coefficients with Fe. Complementary to some previous studies that found that the intercorrelation between heavy metals and active soil components (such as Fe oxides, organic matter, and clay) is the major predictive mechanism, in the present study we concluded that the correlation with total Fe (including active and residual Fe) is the major mechanism. This conclusion was further supported by both correlation analysis and chemical sequential extraction. Correlation analysis showed that all metals are negatively correlated with reflectance while positively correlated with the absorption depth at about 500 nm, a feature resulting from goethite. The chemical forms of heavy metals, which showed that besides the crystalline Fe oxide and organic matter fractions, heavy metals have significant amounts in the residual fraction, also strengthened the conclusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2006.0285

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Chen, J., Ji, J., Gong, P., Liao, Q., Tian, Q., & Ma, H.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
918-926
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2001569762
Cited by
220
References
1
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Mechanism Study of Reflectance Spectroscopy for Investigating Heavy Metals in Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2006.0285
The paper
Wu, Y., Chen, J., Ji, J., Gong, P., Liao, Q., Tian, Q., & Ma, H. (2007). A Mechanism Study of Reflectance Spectroscopy for Investigating Heavy Metals in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.