The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Stock Using Profile Depth Distribution Functions and Ordinary Kriging
Abstract
The objective of this study was to predict and map SOC stocks at different depth intervals within the upper 1‐m depth using profile depth distribution functions and ordinary kriging. These approaches were tested for the state of Indiana as a case study. A total of 464 pedons representing 204 soil series was obtained from the National Soil Survey Center database. Another 48 soil profile samples were collected to better represent the heterogeneity of the environmental variables. Two methods were used to model the depth distribution of the SOC stocks using negative exponential profile depth functions. In Procedure A, the functions to describe the depth distribution of volumetric C content for each soil profile were fitted using nonlinear least squares. In Procedure B, the exponential functions were fitted to describe the depth distribution of the cumulative SOC stocks. The parameters of the functions were interpolated for the entire study area using ordinary kriging on 81% of the data points ( n = 414). The integral of the exponential function up to the desired depth was used to predict SOC stocks within the 0‐ to 1‐, 0‐ to 0.5‐, and 0.5‐ to 1‐m depth intervals. These estimates were validated using the remaining 19% ( n = 98) of the data. Procedure B showed a higher prediction accuracy for all depths, with higher r and lower RMSE values. The highest prediction accuracy ( r = 0.75, RMSE = 2.89 kg m −2 ) was obtained for SOC stocks in the 0‐ to 0.5‐m depth interval. Using Procedure B, SOC stocks within the top 1 m of Indiana soils were estimated to be 0.90 Pg C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
BATJES, N. H. (1996) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x · Cited by 3,213
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Texture, Climate, and Cultivation Effects on Soil Organic Matter Content in U.S. Grassland Soils
Burke, I. C., Yonker, C. M., Parton, W. J., Cole, C. V., Flach, K., & Schimel, D. S. (1989) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300030029x · Cited by 876
Cited by
Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks in Brazil
Gomes, L. C., Faria, R. M., de Souza, E., Veloso, G. V., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., & Filho, E. I. F. (2019) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.007 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, U., Lal, R., Slater, B., Calhoun, F., Liu, D., & Van Meirvenne, M.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 614-621
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2096735011
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Stock Using Profile Depth Distribution Functions and Ordinary Kriging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2007.0410
- The paper
- Mishra, U., Lal, R., Slater, B., Calhoun, F., Liu, D., & Van Meirvenne, M. (2009). Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Stock Using Profile Depth Distribution Functions and Ordinary Kriging. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.