The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiseason Recoveries of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen‐15 in Tropical Cropping Systems
Abstract
In tropical agroecosystems, limited N availability remains a major impediment to increasing yield. A 15 N‐recovery experiment was conducted in 13 diverse tropical agroecosystems. The objectives were to determine the total recovery of one single 15 N application of inorganic or organic N during three to six growing seasons and to establish whether the losses of N are governed by universal principles. Between 7 and 58% (average of 21%) of crop N uptake during the first growing season was derived from fertilizer. On average, 79% of crop N was derived from the soil. When 15 N‐labeled residues were applied, in the first growing season 4% of crop N was derived from the residues. Average recoveries of 15 N‐labeled fertilizer and residue in crops after the first growing season were 33 and 7%, respectively. Corresponding recoveries in the soil were 38 and 71%. An additional 6% of the fertilizer and 9.1% of the residue was recovered by crops during subsequent growing seasons. There were no significant differences in total 15 N recovery (average 54%) between N from fertilizer and N from residue. After five growing seasons, more residue N (40%) than fertilizer N (18%) was recovered in the soil, better sustaining the soil organic matter N content. Long‐term total recoveries of 15 N‐labeled fertilizer or residue in the crop and soil were similar. Soil N remained the primary source of N for crops. As higher rainfall and temperature tend to cause higher 15 N losses, management practices to improve N use efficiency and reduce losses in wet tropical regions will remain a challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Cited by
Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., & Goulding, K. W. T. (2011) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x · Cited by 829
Self-citationLadha, J. K., Tirol-Padre, A., Reddy, C. K., Cassman, K. G., Verma, S., Powlson, D. S., van Kessel, C., de B. Richter, D., Chakraborty, D., & Pathak, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19355 · Cited by 586
Self-citationImplications for Soil Properties of Removing Cereal Straw: Results from Long‐Term Studies1
Powlson, D. S., Glendining, M. J., Coleman, K., & Whitmore, A. P. (2011) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0146s · Cited by 206
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dourado-Neto, D., Powlson, D., Bakar, R. A., Bacchi, O. O. S., Basanta, M. V., Cong, P. T., Keerthisinghe, G., Ismaili, M., Rahman, S. M., Reichardt, K., Safwat, M. S. A., Sangakkara, R., Timm, L. C., Wang, J. Y., Zagal, E., & van Kessel, C.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-152
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2009653729
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiseason Recoveries of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen‐15 in Tropical Cropping Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2009.0192
- The paper
- Dourado-Neto, D., Powlson, D., Bakar, R. A., Bacchi, O. O. S., Basanta, M. V., Cong, P. T., Keerthisinghe, G., Ismaili, M., Rahman, S. M., Reichardt, K., Safwat, M. S. A., Sangakkara, R., Timm, L. C., Wang, J. Y., Zagal, E., & van Kessel, C. (2010). Multiseason Recoveries of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen‐15 in Tropical Cropping Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.