Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiseason Recoveries of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen‐15 in Tropical Cropping Systems

Dourado-Neto, D., Powlson, D., Bakar, R. Abu, Bacchi, O. O. S., Basanta, M.V., Cong, P. thi, Keerthisinghe, G., Ismaili, M., Rahman, S. M., Reichardt, K., Safwat, M. S. A., Sangakkara, R., Timm, L. C., Wang, J. Y., Zagal, E., van Kessel, C.·2010·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

In tropical agroecosystems, limited N availability remains a major impediment to increasing yield. A 15 N‐recovery experiment was conducted in 13 diverse tropical agroecosystems. The objectives were to determine the total recovery of one single 15 N application of inorganic or organic N during three to six growing seasons and to establish whether the losses of N are governed by universal principles. Between 7 and 58% (average of 21%) of crop N uptake during the first growing season was derived from fertilizer. On average, 79% of crop N was derived from the soil. When 15 N‐labeled residues were applied, in the first growing season 4% of crop N was derived from the residues. Average recoveries of 15 N‐labeled fertilizer and residue in crops after the first growing season were 33 and 7%, respectively. Corresponding recoveries in the soil were 38 and 71%. An additional 6% of the fertilizer and 9.1% of the residue was recovered by crops during subsequent growing seasons. There were no significant differences in total 15 N recovery (average 54%) between N from fertilizer and N from residue. After five growing seasons, more residue N (40%) than fertilizer N (18%) was recovered in the soil, better sustaining the soil organic matter N content. Long‐term total recoveries of 15 N‐labeled fertilizer or residue in the crop and soil were similar. Soil N remained the primary source of N for crops. As higher rainfall and temperature tend to cause higher 15 N losses, management practices to improve N use efficiency and reduce losses in wet tropical regions will remain a challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2009.0192

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Dourado-Neto, D., Powlson, D., Bakar, R. A., Bacchi, O. O. S., Basanta, M. V., Cong, P. T., Keerthisinghe, G., Ismaili, M., Rahman, S. M., Reichardt, K., Safwat, M. S. A., Sangakkara, R., Timm, L. C., Wang, J. Y., Zagal, E., & van Kessel, C.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
139-152
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2009653729
Cited by
177
References
2
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiseason Recoveries of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen‐15 in Tropical Cropping Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2009.0192
The paper
Dourado-Neto, D., Powlson, D., Bakar, R. A., Bacchi, O. O. S., Basanta, M. V., Cong, P. T., Keerthisinghe, G., Ismaili, M., Rahman, S. M., Reichardt, K., Safwat, M. S. A., Sangakkara, R., Timm, L. C., Wang, J. Y., Zagal, E., & van Kessel, C. (2010). Multiseason Recoveries of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen‐15 in Tropical Cropping Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.