The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of Soil Fertility Properties from a Globally Distributed Soil Mid‐Infrared Spectral Library
Open accessAbstract
Globally applicable calibrations to predict standard soil properties based on infrared spectra may increase the use of this reliable technique. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of mid‐infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (4000–602 cm −1 ) to predict chemical and textural properties for a globally distributed soil spectral library. We scanned 971 soil samples selected from the International Soil Reference and Information Centre database. A high‐throughput diffuse reflectance accessory was used with optics that exclude specular reflectance as a potential source of error. Archived data on soil chemical and physical properties were calibrated to first derivative spectra using partial least‐squares regression. Good predictions for the spatially independent validation set were achieved for pH value, organic C content, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) (n = 291, r 2 of linear regression of predicted against measured values ≥0.75 and ratio of standard deviation of measured values to root mean square error of prediction (RPD) ≥2.0). The root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) were 0.75 pH units, 9.1 g organic C kg −1 and 5.5 cmol c CEC kg −1 Satisfactory predictions (r 2 = 0.65–0.75, RPD = 1.4–2.0) were obtained for exchangeable Mg concentration and clay content. The respective RMSEPs were 4.3 cmol c kg −1 and 126 g kg −1 Poorer predictions (r 2 = 0.61 and 0.64) were achieved for sand and exchangeable Ca contents. Although RMSEP values are large relative to laboratory analytical errors, our results suggest a marked potential for the global spectral library as a tool for advice on land management, such as the classification of new samples into basic soil fertility classes based on organic C and clay contents, CEC, and pH. Further research is needed to test the stability of this global calibration on new data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ng, W., Minasny, B., Montazerolghaem, M., Padarian, J., Ferguson, R., Bailey, S., & McBratney, A. B. (2019) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.016 · Cited by 466
Vågen, T.-G., Winowiecki, L. A., Abegaz, A., & Hadgu, K. M. (2013) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.006 · Cited by 109
Self-citationEffects of land cover on ecosystem services in Tanzania: A spatial assessment of soil organic carbon
Winowiecki, L., Vågen, T.-G., & Huising, J. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.010 · Cited by 92
Self-citationWinowiecki, L. A., Bargués-Tobella, A., Mukuralinda, A., Mujawamariya, P., Ntawuhiganayo, E. B., Mugayi, A. B., Chomba, S., & Vågen, T.-G. (2021) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-7-767-2021 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Terhoeven-Urselmans, T., Vagen, T.-G., Spaargaren, O., & Shepherd, K. D.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1792-1799
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2124584066
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Soil Fertility Properties from a Globally Distributed Soil Mid‐Infrared Spectral Library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2009.0218
- The paper
- Terhoeven-Urselmans, T., Vagen, T.-G., Spaargaren, O., & Shepherd, K. D. (2010). Prediction of Soil Fertility Properties from a Globally Distributed Soil Mid‐Infrared Spectral Library. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.