The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracing Root vs. Residue Carbon into Soils from Conventional and Alternative Cropping Systems
Abstract
We investigated the fate and rate of stabilization of root vs. residue C and the role of soil aggregates in root‐ vs. residue‐derived C accumulation within long‐term conventional (mineral fertilizer), low‐input (mineral fertilizer and cover crop), and organic (manure and cover crop) cropping systems. Both hairy vetch ( Vicia dasycarpa Ten.) roots and residue were 13 C labeled in situ and then traced into whole‐soil samples and three soil organic matter (SOM) fractions (coarse particulate organic matter [CPOM, >250 μm], microaggregates [53–250 μm], and silt and clay [<53 μm]). At the end of the maize ( Zea mays L.) growing season, ∼52% of the root‐derived C was still present in the soil, while only ∼4% of residue‐derived C remained. These results suggest that root C contributes more to overall C stabilization than residue C, which supports a nascent body of research demonstrating greater retention of root‐derived than residue‐derived C in SOM. The ratio of root‐ to residue‐derived C (an indicator of relative root contribution) was higher in the microaggregates and silt‐and‐clay fractions than the CPOM of low‐input and conventional systems. In contrast, relative root contribution was greater in the whole soil of the organic (6.76) than the conventional (1.43) and low‐input cropping systems (3.24), and particularly greater in the CPOM of the organic system (7.53). This trend mirrored long‐term soil C stocks across the cropping systems, i.e., organic > low input = conventional, and suggests that the CPOM fraction is pivotal to short‐term accumulation of root‐derived C and, ultimately, to long‐term C sequestration under organic crop management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss95-075 · Cited by 1,686
M., S., J., S., & R., D. (2001) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-001-0423-7 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D. A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10386 · Cited by 6,057
Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12113 · Cited by 3,552
The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and Biotic and Abiotic Controls
Jackson, R. B., Lajtha, K., Crow, S. E., Hugelius, G., Kramer, M. G., & Piñeiro, G. (2017) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054234 · Cited by 1,249
Sokol, N. W., Kuebbing, S. E., Karlsen‐Ayala, E., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15361 · Cited by 631
Schrumpf, M., Kaiser, K., Guggenberger, G., Persson, T., Kögel-Knabner, I., & Schulze, E.-D. (2013) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-10-1675-2013 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, A. Y. Y., & Six, J.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1201-1210
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2091474511
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracing Root vs. Residue Carbon into Soils from Conventional and Alternative Cropping Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2009.0346
- The paper
- Kong, A. Y. Y., & Six, J. (2010). Tracing Root vs. Residue Carbon into Soils from Conventional and Alternative Cropping Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.