Influence of contrasting biochar types on five soils at increasing rates of application
Abstract
A series of experiments was established to characterize biochars made from four feedstocks regionally available in the Pacific Northwest (wood pellets, softwood bark, switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) straw, and anaerobically digested fiber) to determine their effect on five soils. Soils were amended with 9.8, 19.5, and 39.0 Mg ha −1 of each of the four biochars and evaluated for changes in pH, water holding capacity, N mineralization, and soil C. The C content of biochars derived from the herbaceous feedstocks was 60 to 67 kg kg −1 whereas that of the woody feedstocks was >75 kg kg −1 . In amended soils we found that biochars, regardless of origin, significantly raised the pH of all soil types 0.1 to 0.9 units, with the greatest impact on a sand soil. The biochars increased the soil C and water holding capacity at the higher rates of amendment depending on soil and biochar type. Nitrogen mineralization rates decreased in three of the five soils across all feedstocks. There were significant correlations ( r ≥ 0.9) between biochar C measured and biochar C added regardless of feedstock or soil type. Our research demonstrates that in temperate soils, biochar feedstock may not be as important a variable as soil type for increasing C content and pH but can influence N mineralization and water holding capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biochar addition has no effect on mineralization.
“have no effect on mineralization [20,70]”
From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [70]
The influence of biochar additions on nutrient availability to plants is not entirely clear as both increasing and decreasing nutrient uptake and biomass production have been reported depending on the quality and rate of biochar applied.
“However, the influence of biochar additions on nutrient availability to plants is not entirely clear as both increasing and decreasing nutrient uptake and biomass production have been reported depending on the quality and rate of biochar applied (Bruun et al., 2012;Kloss et al., 2014;Streubel et al., 2011).”
From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Streubel et al., 2011
Streubel et al. (2011) found a 0.1 to 0.9 unit pH increase of an alkaline sandy soil.
“Contrarily, Streubel et al. (2011) found 0.1 to 0.9 unit pH increase of an alkaline sandy soil.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Streubel et al., 2011
Water holding capacity of Quincy sand soil remained unchanged in a laboratory incubation study with biochars prepared from switch grass, anaerobically digested fiber, softwood bark and wood pellet.
“In contrast, water holding capacity of Quincy sand soil of Washington State remained unchanged in a laboratory incubation study with the application of biochars prepared from switch grass, anaerobically digested fiber, softwood bark and wood pellet (Streubel et al., 2011).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Streubel et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- Streubel, J. D., Collins, H. P., Garcia-Perez, M., Tarara, J., Granatstein, D., & Kruger, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Dep. of Biological Systems Engineering Washington State Univ. Pullman WA 99164‐6120
- Corresponding author
- Collins, H. P.
- ORCID
- Collins, H. P.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1402-1413
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2088863732
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 19.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Keywords
- biochar, biochar feedstock, soil amendment, soil pH, soil carbon, nitrogen mineralization, water holding capacity, wood pellets, softwood bark, biochar application rate, temperate soils, Pacific Northwest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review