Field‐Scale Water Flow Simulations Using Ensembles of Pedotransfer Functions for Soil Water Retention
Abstract
Using pedotransfer functions (PTF) to estimate soil hydraulic properties may be necessary in soil water flow simulations for large‐scale projects or in pilot studies. The accuracy of a PTF outside of its development dataset is generally unknown. The existence of multiple models that are developed and tested in one region, but may perform relatively poorly in other regions, is also common in meteorology, where multimodel ensemble prediction techniques have been developed (i.e., those using an averaged prediction from several models) to address this problem. The objective of this work was to estimate the applicability of an ensemble of PTFs for water regime simulations. Measured soil water contents and pressure heads of 60 points at five depths in a 6‐m transect of a layered loamy soil were collected during an extremely wet year in Belgium. Soil water fluxes were measured with passive capillary lysimeters at two depths. Water retention was measured in the laboratory on samples taken at 60 locations at three depths. Contents of soil textural fractions, organic matter content, and bulk density were averaged across the transect and used as input in the ensemble of 22 published PTFs developed from large datasets in different regions. The HYDRUS‐1D software was used to simulate water content time series with (i) each of the PTFs from the ensemble and (ii) the laboratory‐measured water retention data of each of the 60 locations. Simulations with the PTF ensemble had, on average, two times smaller errors those from using laboratory data. A possible explanation for this is that the PTF estimation gave substantially better approximations of field water retention than the laboratory data. The ensemble prediction appears to be a promising source of soil hydraulic properties to simulate soil water dynamics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uncertainty of soil moisture derived from pedotransfer functions can affect C flux simulations.
“The uncertainty of soil moisture derived from pedotransfer functions can affect C flux simulations [183].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [183]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Guber, A. K., Pachepsky, Y. A., van Genuchten, M. T., Rawls, W. J., Simunek, J., Jacques, D., Nicholson, T. J., & Cady, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- USDA‐ARS Environmental Microbial Safety Lab., BARC‐East 173 Powder Mill Rd. Beltsville MD 20705
- USDA‐ARS George E. Brown, Jr. Salinity Lab. Riverside CA
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Dep. of Earth and Environmental Sciences Univ. of California Riverside CA 92521
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE)
- United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US)
- Venue
- Vadose Zone Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 234-247
- ISSN
- 1539-1663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133346604
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vadose Zone Journal (publishedVersion)
- SCK CEN Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (EAR‐9876800)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Keywords
- pedotransfer functions, ensemble forecasting, soil water retention, soil hydraulic properties, HYDRUS-1D, soil moisture, pressure head, soil water flux, soil texture, organic matter, bulk density, field-scale simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review