Cited by 6Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular StructureGeological and Geochemical AnalysisMineralogy and Gemology Studies

The Gibbs energy of formation of huntite, CaMg 3 (CO 3 ) 4 , at 295 K and 1 bar from electrochemical cell measurements

Walling, Erin M., Rock, Peter A., Casey, William H.·1995·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Other| April 01, 1995 The Gibbs energy of formation of huntite, CaMg3(CO3)4, at 295 K and 1 bar from electrochemical cell measurements Erin M. Walling; Erin M. Walling University of California, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Peter A. Rock; Peter A. Rock Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar William H. Casey William H. Casey Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Erin M. Walling University of California, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States Peter A. Rock William H. Casey Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1945-3027 Print ISSN: 0003-004X Copyright © 1995 by the Mineralogical Society of America American Mineralogist (1995) 80 (3-4): 355–360. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1995-3-417 Article history First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Erin M. Walling, Peter A. Rock, William H. Casey; The Gibbs energy of formation of huntite, CaMg3(CO3)4, at 295 K and 1 bar from electrochemical cell measurements. American Mineralogist 1995;; 80 (3-4): 355–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1995-3-417 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyAmerican Mineralogist Search Advanced Search Abstract New data are presented for the ΔGf0 for huntite, CaMg3(CO3)4. Measurements were made using new third-kind electrochemical cells that do not require a complicated model for solute speciation or corrections for liquid-liquid junction potentials. The average value of ΔGf0[CaMg3(CO3)4(S)](−4195.6±6.4 kJ/mol) measured in these electrochemical cells agrees, within experimental error, with values determined calorimetricaUy (e.g., −4203.4 ± 1.6 kj/mol: Hemingway and Robie, 1973) and electrochemically (−4188.6 ± 1.0 kj/mol: Gamsjäger, 1989). Our results demonstrate the utility of this new electrochemical method in the study of metal carbonate equilibria of geochemical importance. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-1995-3-417

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydromagnesite then very slowly transitions to magnesite until reaching 100 bar, the most favorable pressure for magnesite production.

    “Hydromagnesite then very slowly transitions to magnesite until reaching 100 bar, the most favorable pressure for magnesite production.66”
  • An investigation of Mg-carbonate systems found that the first species formed is metastable nesquehonite (25°C, 1 bar PCO2), followed by metastable hydromagnesite (120°C, 3 bar).

    “An investigation of Mg-carbonate systems found that the first species formed is metastable nesquehonite (25°C, 1 bar P CO 2 ), followed by metastable hydromagnesite (120°C, 3 bar).”
  • A low ratio of Mg2+ to CO3 2- could overcome the increased hydration activity of Mg2+ ions, allowing for easier adsorption on the crystal surface.

    “A low ratio of Mg 2+ to CO 3 2-could overcome the increased hydration activity of Mg 2+ ions, as carbonate anions have a larger radius and are not completely surrounded by water.This allows for easier adsorption on the crystal surface.66”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walling, E. M., Rock, P. A., & Casey, W. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
1995-04-01
Volume
80
Issue
3-4
Pages
355-360
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2183596460
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Mineralogist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
Keywords
huntite, Gibbs energy of formation, calcium magnesium carbonate, carbonate minerals, electrochemical cells, thermodynamic properties, standard Gibbs energy of formation, standard enthalpy of formation, standard entropy, standard enthalpy of solution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review