The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In situ study of the goethite-hematite phase transformation by real time synchrotron powder diffraction
Open accessAbstract
Goethite (010), (110), and (111) growth faces and (010) cleavage surfaces of large, natural single crystals, as well as a high surface area synthetic sample were characterized using various surface sensitive microscopies and spectroscopies. Differential interference contrast and atomic force microscopy characterization of the natural single crystal faces showed microtopography indicative of growth, dissolution, and cleavage. Low energy electron diffraction patterns of the goethite (010) surface exhibit sharp, intense diffraction spots, indicating long-range order on this important surface. These patterns have two-dimensional point group symmetry 2mm, consistent with an undistorted surface structure and unitcell parameters a = 4.62 ± 0.14 Å and c = 2.99 ± 0.08 Å. These parameters equal the equivalent bulk cell dimensions given the uncertainties. Ultra-high vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy was performed on (010) cleavage faces, although the tunneling properties of the surface were very heterogeneous. Atomic resolution was not obtained; however, microtopographic images are identical to those collected with AFM. XPS spectra from the (010) faces of two natural samples as well as the synthetic powder all have peak maxima for Fe (2p 3/2 ) at 711.5 ± 0.1 eV. The O(1 s) line originating from the goethite can be fit with two peaks with a chemical shift of 1.3 eV. The peak at higher binding energy (531.3 eV ± 0.1 eV) represents the protonated oxygen in the structure, and the peak at lower binding energy (530.0 eV ± 0.1 eV) represents the proton-free oxygen in the structure. Ab initio and semi-empirical models of the (010) surface suggest that cleavage occurs through the hydroxide plane at 1/4 b in the structure. This is contrary to cleavage through the oxide plane at 1/2 b, which has been assumed in several previous studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sivula, K., Zboril, R., Le Formal, F., Robert, R., Weidenkaff, A., Tucek, J., Frydrych, J., & Grätzel, M. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja101564f · Cited by 937
Size-dependent structural transformations of hematite nanoparticles. 1. Phase transition
Chernyshova, I. V., Hochella Jr, M. F., & Madden, A. S. (2007) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b618790k · Cited by 463
Fire effects on soils: the human dimension
Santín, C., & Doerr, S. H. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0171 · Cited by 312
Cutting, R. S., Coker, V. S., Fellowes, J. W., Lloyd, J. R., & Vaughan, D. J. (2009) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.009 · Cited by 198
In situ FTIR study on the dehydration of natural goethite
Prasad, P. S. R., Shiva Prasad, K., Krishna Chaitanya, V., Babu, E. V. S. S. K., Sreedhar, B., & Ramana Murthy, S. (2006) · Journal of Asian Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.05.005 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Gualtieri, A. F., & Venturelli, P.
- Venue
- American Mineralogist
- Publisher
- Mineralogical Society of America
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 895-904
- ISSN
- 0003-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161825099
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ study of the goethite-hematite phase transformation by real time synchrotron powder diffraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am-1999-5-624
- The paper
- Gualtieri, A. F., & Venturelli, P. (1999). In situ study of the goethite-hematite phase transformation by real time synchrotron powder diffraction. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1999-5-624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.