Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Raman spectroscopy of Fe-Ti-Cr-oxides, case study: Martian meteorite EETA79001

Wang, Alian, Kuebler, Karla E., Jolliff, Bradley L., Haskin, Larry A.·2004·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Raman spectral features of chromite, ulvöspinel, magnetite, ilmenite, hematite, and some of their solid solutions are presented. Although most Fe-Ti-Cr-oxides produce relatively weak Raman signals compared to oxyanionic minerals, sufficient information can be extracted from their spectra to identify the end-member mineral phases as well as some information about compositional variations in solid solutions. Correlations between Raman spectral features and mineral chemistry are used to interpret the Raman data of Fe-Ti-Cr oxides found during Raman point-count measurements on rock chips of Martian meteorite EETA79001, as an analog to Mars on-surface planetary investigations. In general, ulvöspinel, magnetite, and chromite end-members are readily distinguished by their Raman spectral patterns, as are ilmenite and hematite. In the low signal-to-noise (S/N) spectra generally obtained from the Raman point-count procedure, the position and shape of the strongest peak of Fe-Ti-Cr oxides in the region 660-680 cm -1 (A 1g mode) is the most useful for discriminating Fe 3+ -Ti-Cr-Al substitutions in the magnetite-ulvöspinel, ulvöspinel-chromite, and chromite-spinel series, but minor peaks in the range 300-600 cm -1 also assist in discrimination. These spectral features are useful for investigating the variability among Fe-Ti-Cr-Al oxide solid solutions in natural samples. In EETA79001, a Martian basaltic meteorite, most of the oxide grains (as measured with the electron microprobe) are ulvöspinel, chromian ulvöspinel, and chromite, but ilmenite, titanian chromite, and titanomagnetite are also observed. The Fe-Ti-Cr-oxides identified by Raman point-count include end-member ilmenite, low-Al chromite-spinel solid solutions, ulvöspinel-magnetite solid solutions, and more complex chromitespinel- ulvöspinel-magnetite solid solutions; the latter exhibit a wide range of main peak positions and broadened peak widths that may reflect structural disorder as well as specific cation contents. One Raman spectrum suggests end-member magnetite, and one spectrum from a different rock chip appears to be that of non-terrestrial hematite, reflecting local oxidizing alteration, which has not been observed previously in this meteorite. These results show that analyses done in an automated mode on the surface of an unprepared Martian rock sample can provide useful constraints on the Fe-Ti-Cr oxide mineralogy present and on compositional variations within those minerals, including an indication of oxygen fugacity

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-2004-5-601

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Wang, A., Kuebler, K. E., Jolliff, B. L., & Haskin, L. A.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
2004-05
Volume
89
Issue
5-6
Pages
665-680
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2306872687
Cited by
234
References
0
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Raman spectroscopy of Fe-Ti-Cr-oxides, case study: Martian meteorite EETA79001. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am-2004-5-601
The paper
Wang, A., Kuebler, K. E., Jolliff, B. L., & Haskin, L. A. (2004). Raman spectroscopy of Fe-Ti-Cr-oxides, case study: Martian meteorite EETA79001. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2004-5-601

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.