Cited by 53Mineralogy and Gemology StudiesGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping

Carbon mineral ecology: Predicting the undiscovered minerals of carbon

Open access
Hazen, Robert M., Hummer, Daniel R., Hystad, Grethe, Downs, Robert T., Golden, Joshua J.·2016·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Studies in mineral ecology exploit mineralogical databases to document diversity-distribution relationships of minerals—relationships that are integral to characterizing “Earth-like” planets. As carbon is the most crucial element to life on Earth, as well as one of the defining constituents of a planet’s near-surface mineralogy, we focus here on the diversity and distribution of carbon-bearing minerals. We applied a Large Number of Rare Events (LNRE) model to the 403 known minerals of carbon, using 82 922 mineral species/locality data tabulated in http://mindat.org (as of 1 January 2015). We find that all carbon-bearing minerals, as well as subsets containing C with O, H, Ca, or Na, conform to LNRE distributions. Our model predicts that at least 548 C minerals exist on Earth today, indicating that at least 145 carbon-bearing mineral species have yet to be discovered. Furthermore, by analyzing subsets of the most common additional elements in carbon-bearing minerals (i.e., 378 C + O species; 282 C + H species; 133 C + Ca species; and 100 C + Na species), we predict that approximately 129 of these missing carbon minerals contain oxygen, 118 contain hydrogen, 52 contain calcium, and more than 60 contain sodium. The majority of these as yet undescribed minerals are predicted to be hydrous carbonates, many of which may have been overlooked because they are colorless, poorly crystalized, and/or water-soluble. We tabulate 432 chemical formulas of plausible as yet undiscovered carbon…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-2016-5546

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazen, R. M., Hummer, D. R., Hystad, G., Downs, R. T., & Golden, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • Purdue University Northwest (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Hazen, Robert M.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
2016-04
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
889-906
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324312142
Cited by
53
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
American Mineralogist (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Keywords
mineral discovery, mineral localities, Earth-like planets, oxalate, formate, carbides, hydrocarbons, isomorphs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review