The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of nanoparticulate magnetite stoichiometry by Mossbauer spectroscopy, acidic dissolution, and powder X-ray diffraction: A critical review
Abstract
A solid solution can exist of magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ), which is commonly referred to as nonstoichiometric or partially oxidized magnetite. The degree of stoichiometry in magnetite is quantitatively measured by determining the ratio of Fe 2+ to Fe 3+ . Magnetite stoichiometry (x = Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ ) strongly influences several physical properties, including the coercitivity, sorption capacity, reduction potential, and crystalline structure. Magnetite stoichiometry has been extensively studied, although very little work exists examining the stoichiometry of nanoparticulate samples (<<100 nm); when the stoichiometry was measured for nanoparticulate samples, it was not validated with a secondary technique. Here, we review the three most common techniques to determine magnetite stoichiometry: (1) acidic dissolution; (2) Mössbauer spectroscopy; and (3) powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD), specifically with nanoparticulate samples in mind. Eight samples of nonstoichiometric magnetite were synthesized with x ranging from 0 to 0.50 and with the particle size kept as similar as possible (BET specific surface area = 63 ± 7 m 2 /g; particle size ≈ 20 nm). Our measurements indicate excellent agreement between stoichiometries determined from Mössbauer spectra and by acidic dissolution, suggesting that Mössbauer spectroscopy may be a useful means for estimating magnetite stoichiometry in nanoparticulate, multi-phases samples, such as those found in the environment. A significant linear correlation was also observed between the unit-cell length (a) of magnetite measured by pXRD and magnetite stoichiometry, indicating that pXRD may also be useful for determining particle stoichiometry, especially for mixed phased samples
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competing Fe (II)-induced mineralization pathways of ferrihydrite
Hansel, C. M., Benner, S. G., & Fendorf, S. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050666z · Cited by 619
Cited by
Fe(II) Redox Chemistry in the Environment
Huang, J., Jones, A., Waite, T. D., Chen, Y., Huang, X., Rosso, K. M., Kappler, A., Mansor, M., Tratnyek, P. G., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01286 · Cited by 620
Usman, M., Byrne, J. M., Chaudhary, A., Orsetti, S., Hanna, K., Ruby, C., Kappler, A., & Haderlein, S. B. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00224 · Cited by 484
Redox cycling of Fe(II) and Fe(III) in magnetite by Fe-metabolizing bacteria
Byrne, J. M., Klueglein, N., Pearce, C., Rosso, K. M., Appel, E., & Kappler, A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4834 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorski, C. A., & Scherer, M. M.
- Venue
- American Mineralogist
- Publisher
- Mineralogical Society of America
- Published
- 2010-06-23
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1017-1026
- ISSN
- 0003-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062880976
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of nanoparticulate magnetite stoichiometry by Mossbauer spectroscopy, acidic dissolution, and powder X-ray diffraction: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am.2010.3435
- The paper
- Gorski, C. A., & Scherer, M. M. (2010). Determination of nanoparticulate magnetite stoichiometry by Mossbauer spectroscopy, acidic dissolution, and powder X-ray diffraction: A critical review. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2010.3435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.