The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup
Abstract
A new classification and nomenclature scheme for the amphibole-supergroup minerals is described, based on the general formula AB(2)C(5)T(8)O(22)W(2), where A = square, Na, K, Ca, Pb, Li; B = Na, Ca, Mn2+, Fe2+, Mg, Li; C = Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+, Al, Fe3+, Mn3+, Ti4+, Li; T = Si, Al, Ti4+, Be; W = (OH), F, Cl, O2-. Distinct arrangements of formal charges at the sites (or groups of sites) in the amphibole structure warrant distinct root names, and are, by implication, distinct species; for a specific root name, different homovalent cations (e.g., Mg vs. Fe) or anions (e.g., OH vs. Fe2+) are indicated by prefixes (e.g., ferro-, fluoro-). The Classification is based on the A, B, and C groups of cations and the W group of anions, as these groups show the maximum compositional variability in the amphibole structure. The amphibole supergroup is divided into two groups according to the dominant W species: (w)(OH,F,Cl)-dominant amphiboles and O-w-dominant amphiboles (oxo-amphiboles). Amphiboles with (OH, F, Cl) dominant at W are divided into eight subgroups according to the dominant charge-arrangements and type of B-group cations: magnesium-iron-manganese amphiboles, calcium amphiboles, sodium-calcium amphiboles, sodium amphiboles, lithium amphiboles, sodium-(magnesium-iron-manganese) amphiboles, lithium-(magnesium-iron-manganese) amphiboles and lithium-calcium amphiboles. Within each of these subgroups, the A- and C-group cations are used to assign specific names to specific compositional r…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This analysis confirms the belonging of the amphibole class to the subgroup of calcium amphiboles, as reported by the IMA classification17. Furthermore, according to the classification reported by Leake et al.18, the calcium amphiboles themselves of the analyzed samples belong to the tremolite-actinolite series.”
From Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naturally Occurring Asbestos: Potential for Human Exposure, Southern Nevada, USA
Buck, B. J., Goossens, D., Metcalf, R. V., McLaurin, B., Ren, M., & Freudenberger, F. (2013) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.05.0183 · Cited by 75
Gualtieri, A. F., Lusvardi, G., Zoboli, A., Di Giuseppe, D., & Lassinantti Gualtieri, M. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.011 · Cited by 52
Pollastri, S., D’Acapito, F., Trapananti, A., Colantoni, I., Andreozzi, G. B., & Gualtieri, A. F. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.010 · Cited by 51
Mineral Fibres and Asbestos Bodies in Human Lung Tissue: A Case Study
Di Giuseppe, D., Zoboli, A., Vigliaturo, R., Gieré, R., Bonasoni, M. P., Sala, O., & Gualtieri, A. F. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9100618 · Cited by 26
“, M(4) site) are irregular octahedral or 8-fold coordinated cation sites (Na+, Li+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Mg2+); C are cations (Mg2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Mn3+, Al3+, Ti3+, Ti4+, Li+,) that occur in the regular octahedrally coordinated cavities M(1), M(2) and M(3); T are the tetrahedrally coordinated sites within the silicat…”
BackgroundLa Maestra, S., Militello, G. M., Alberti, S., Benvenuti, M., & Gaggero, L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86325-z · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawthorne, F. C., Oberti, R., Harlow, G. E., Maresch, W. V., Martin, R. F., Schumacher, J. C., & Welch, M. D.
- Venue
- American Mineralogist
- Publisher
- Mineralogical Society of America
- Published
- 2012-10-29
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 2031-2048
- ISSN
- 0003-004X
- Cited by
- 1,216
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am.2012.4276
- The paper
- Hawthorne, F. C., Oberti, R., Harlow, G. E., Maresch, W. V., Martin, R. F., Schumacher, J. C., & Welch, M. D. (2012). Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4276