The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Texture and Anisotropy
Abstract
Research Article| January 01, 2002 Texture and Anisotropy Hans-Rudolph Wenk Hans-Rudolph Wenk Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Hans-Rudolph Wenk Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 03 Mar 2017 © The Mineralogical Society Of America Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2002) 51 (1): 291–329. https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.51.1.291 Article history First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Hans-Rudolph Wenk; Texture and Anisotropy. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2002;; 51 (1): 291–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.51.1.291 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search The study of preferred orientation of minerals in rocks dates back to Omalius d'Halloy (1833) who attributes a special significance to the alignment of crystals as an indicator of the formation process. Much later the influence of crystal alignment on physical properties was quantified (e.g., Weissenberg 1922, Voigt 1928, Reuss 1929). Only recently has this field emerged as a coherent part of earth science research linking such branches as mineralogy, petrology, structural geology, geodynamics and seismology. The reason for this was the emergence of quantitative methods to analyze preferred orientation, or "texture" as it was first called... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physics and phenomenology of strain hardening: the FCC case
Kocks, U. F., & Mecking, H. (2003) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6425(02)00003-8 · Cited by 3,286
Thijs, L., Kempen, K., Kruth, J.-P., & Van Humbeeck, J. (2013) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.052 · Cited by 1,917
Tuch, D. S. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20279 · Cited by 1,880
Law, R. D. (2014) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2014.05.023 · Cited by 420
Strong texturing of lithium metal in batteries
Shi, F., Pei, A., Vailionis, A., Xie, J., Liu, B., Zhao, J., Gong, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708224114 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenk, H.-R.
- Venue
- Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
- Publisher
- Mineralogical Society of America
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 291-329
- ISSN
- 1529-6466 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057301489
- Cited by
- 931
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Texture and Anisotropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/gsrmg.51.1.291
- The paper
- Wenk, H.-R. (2002). Texture and Anisotropy. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.51.1.291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.