Relational Quantum Mechanics and the Determinacy Problem
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extant versions of RQM do not provide any reason to think that Bob's measurement outcomes will match Alice's.
“Brown (2007) and Pienaar (2021) have analyzed similar cases and have similarly concluded that extant versions of RQM do not provide any reason to think that Bob's measurement outcomes will match Alice's.”
From Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics (2023) · cites this paper as Brown 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics
Adlam, E., & Rovelli, C. (2023) · Philosophy of Physics · doi:10.31389/pop.8 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Matthew J.
- ORCID
- Brown, Matthew J.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 679-695
- ISSN
- 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W2007549796
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- relational quantum mechanics, Carlo Rovelli, measurement problem, quantum superposition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review