PreprintCited by 17Family Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Family Dynamics

Mate Selection in the Network Society: The Role of the Internet in Reconfiguring Marriages in Australia, the United Kingdom and United States

Open access
Dutton, William H., Helsper, Ellen Johanna, Whitty, Monica T., Buckwalter, Galen, Lee, Erina·2008·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This working paper explores the role of the Internet in reconfiguring marriages, introducing couples that meet in person and later marry, through a set of online surveys of married couples in Britain, Australia, and the US. We found that a sizeable proportion of online married couples in each country first met their spouse online, usually through an online dating service, chat room or on instant messaging (IM). This is more prominent for younger couples, but many couples at all ages can be found who met online. Moreover, our initial analyses, based on UK couples, indicate that meeting online is likely to introduce people to others whom they would not be as likely to meet through other means. The Internet might well open people to more diversity in their choice of a partner, such as by introducing individuals with greater differences in age or education, but with more similar interests and values. These findings are preliminary, but suggestive of significant social trends and indirect implications of social networking in the digital age. Based on these observations, we are planning to extend our analyses of the differences across couples introduced online and offline to our Australian and US samples. Also, we are planning additional surveys in more countries that can examine the degree that these findings can be supported in other contexts and overtime. This working paper was prepared for discussion at a forum, entitled 'Meeting, Dating, Marriage and the Internet', held at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 3 October 2008. The research was supported by a grant from eHarmony, a US based online match-making company supporting research on the science of relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.1275810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 6% of married UK couples who use the Internet had met their partner online.

    “Dutton, Helsper, Whitty, Buckwalter and Lee 8 found that 6% of married UK couples who use the Internet had met their partner online.”

    From The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutton, W. H., Helsper, E. J., Whitty, M. T., Buckwalter, G., & Lee, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Dutton, William H.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1552268158
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
Keywords
online dating, instant messaging, chat rooms, online dating services, partner diversity, social networking, mate choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review