Mate Selection in the Network Society: The Role of the Internet in Reconfiguring Marriages in Australia, the United Kingdom and United States
Open accessAbstract
This working paper explores the role of the Internet in reconfiguring marriages, introducing couples that meet in person and later marry, through a set of online surveys of married couples in Britain, Australia, and the US. We found that a sizeable proportion of online married couples in each country first met their spouse online, usually through an online dating service, chat room or on instant messaging (IM). This is more prominent for younger couples, but many couples at all ages can be found who met online. Moreover, our initial analyses, based on UK couples, indicate that meeting online is likely to introduce people to others whom they would not be as likely to meet through other means. The Internet might well open people to more diversity in their choice of a partner, such as by introducing individuals with greater differences in age or education, but with more similar interests and values. These findings are preliminary, but suggestive of significant social trends and indirect implications of social networking in the digital age. Based on these observations, we are planning to extend our analyses of the differences across couples introduced online and offline to our Australian and US samples. Also, we are planning additional surveys in more countries that can examine the degree that these findings can be supported in other contexts and overtime. This working paper was prepared for discussion at a forum, entitled 'Meeting, Dating, Marriage and the Internet', held at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 3 October 2008. The research was supported by a grant from eHarmony, a US based online match-making company supporting research on the science of relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
6% of married UK couples who use the Internet had met their partner online.
“Dutton, Helsper, Whitty, Buckwalter and Lee 8 found that 6% of married UK couples who use the Internet had met their partner online.”
From The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime (2012) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime
Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0352 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationAnatomy of the online dating romance scam
Whitty, M. T. (2015) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/sj.2012.57 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Dutton et al (2008) found that 6 per cent of married UK couples who use the Internet had met their partner online.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Dutton, W. H., Helsper, E. J., Whitty, M. T., Buckwalter, G., & Lee, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dutton, William H.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1552268158
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- online dating, instant messaging, chat rooms, online dating services, partner diversity, social networking, mate choice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review