PreprintCited by 119Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityLegal and Constitutional StudiesDigital Transformation in Law

Nerdy Money: Bitcoin, the Private Digital Currency, and the Case Against Its Regulation

Open access
Kaplanov, Nikolei·2012·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This Comment explores the lawfulness of using bitcoin, a privately-issued currency transacted on a peer-to-peer network, and the ability of the federal government to bar transactions between two willing parties. While there are no cases yet challenging the ability of parties in the United States to make transactions using bitcoins, there are policymakers who have denounced the use of bitcoin. This has led to the question of whether the federal government has the ability under current federal law to prohibit the use of bitcoins between willing parties. This Comment will show that the federal government has no basis to stop bitcoin users who engage in traditional consumer purchases and transfers. This Comment further argues that the federal government should refrain from passing any laws or regulations limiting the use of bitcoins. Should any claim arise, this Comment argues that there is a perfectly acceptable model with which to analogize bitcoin use: community currencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2115203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many proponents of Bitcoin share a libertarian vision of establishing a currency beyond the control and oversight of states.

    “First, many proponents of Bitcoin share a libertarian vision of establishing a currency that is beyond the control and oversight of states (Dowd 2014; Golumbia 2016; Kaplanov 2012).”

    From The Ethics of Alternative Currencies (2022) · cites this paper as Kaplanov 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 119

Authors
Kaplanov, N.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplanov, Nikolei
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
111
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123805720
Cited by
119
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Loyola consumer law review
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
Keywords
Bitcoin, cryptocurrency regulation, private digital currencies, currency devaluation, Elizabeth I, Irish coinage, Nine Years' War, inflation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review