Nerdy Money: Bitcoin, the Private Digital Currency, and the Case Against Its Regulation
Open accessAbstract
This Comment explores the lawfulness of using bitcoin, a privately-issued currency transacted on a peer-to-peer network, and the ability of the federal government to bar transactions between two willing parties. While there are no cases yet challenging the ability of parties in the United States to make transactions using bitcoins, there are policymakers who have denounced the use of bitcoin. This has led to the question of whether the federal government has the ability under current federal law to prohibit the use of bitcoins between willing parties. This Comment will show that the federal government has no basis to stop bitcoin users who engage in traditional consumer purchases and transfers. This Comment further argues that the federal government should refrain from passing any laws or regulations limiting the use of bitcoins. Should any claim arise, this Comment argues that there is a perfectly acceptable model with which to analogize bitcoin use: community currencies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many proponents of Bitcoin share a libertarian vision of establishing a currency beyond the control and oversight of states.
“First, many proponents of Bitcoin share a libertarian vision of establishing a currency that is beyond the control and oversight of states (Dowd 2014; Golumbia 2016; Kaplanov 2012).”
From The Ethics of Alternative Currencies (2022) · cites this paper as Kaplanov 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Kaplanov, N.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaplanov, Nikolei
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123805720
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- Loyola consumer law review
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
- Keywords
- Bitcoin, cryptocurrency regulation, private digital currencies, currency devaluation, Elizabeth I, Irish coinage, Nine Years' War, inflation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review