The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
A New Heuristic Measure of Fragility and Tail Risks: Application to Stress Testing
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a simple heuristic measure of tail risk, which is applied to individual bank stress tests and to public debt. Stress testing can be seen as a first order test of the level of potential negative outcomes in response to tail shocks. However, the results of stress testing can be misleading in the presence of model error and the uncertainty attending parameters and their estimation. The heuristic can be seen as a second order stress test to detect nonlinearities in the tails that can lead to fragility, i.e., provide additional information on the robustness of stress tests. It also shows how the measure can be used to assess the robustness of public debt forecasts, an important issue in many countries. The heuristic measure outlined here can be used in a variety of situations to ascertain an ordinal ranking of fragility to tail risks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Taleb, Canetti et al (2012) developed a heuristic in parallel with this paper to apply to stress testing or more generally, valuations.”
From Mathematical Definition, Mapping, and Detection of (Anti)Fragility (2012) · cites this paper as Taleb, Canetti et al (2012)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mr. Christian Schmieder, Mr. Tidiane Kinda, Mr. Nassim N. Taleb, Ms. Elena Loukoianova, Mr. Elie Canetti, A New Heuristic Measure of Fragility and Tail Risks, 2012, 24, 2012 · DOI · Paper page
- Mr. Christian Schmieder, Mr. Tidiane Kinda, Mr. Nassim N. Taleb, Ms. Elena Loukoianova, Mr. Elie Canetti, Front Matter, 2012, 2012 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mathematical Definition, Mapping, and Detection of (Anti)Fragility
Taleb, N. N., & Douady, R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1208.1189
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmieder, C., Kinda, T., Taleb, N., Loukoianova, E., & Canetti, E.
- Affiliations
- International Monetary Fund (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Taleb, Nassim
- Venue
- IMF Working Papers
- Publisher
- International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 2012
- Issue
- 216
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- 1018-5941
- OpenAlex
- W2015973916
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
- Keywords
- tail risk, fragility, bank stress testing, public debt, model error, parameter uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Heuristic Measure of Fragility and Tail Risks: Application to Stress Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.2156095
- The paper
- Schmieder, C., Kinda, T., Taleb, N., Loukoianova, E., & Canetti, E. (2012). A New Heuristic Measure of Fragility and Tail Risks: Application to Stress Testing. IMF Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2156095