Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 17Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityObesity and Health PracticesNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occupational Characteristics and the Obesity Wage Penalty

Open access
Shinall, Jennifer Bennett·2014·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that obese women are more likely to work in jobs that emphasize physical activity, but they are less likely to work in jobs that emphasize public interaction. The same patterns in occupational characteristics do not exist for obese men. In light of prior literature finding an unexplained wage gap between obese women and non-obese women, these results are particularly relevant since physical activity jobs pay relatively less on average, while public interaction jobs pay relatively more. Moreover, the few obese women who work in public interaction occupations receive lower wages than non-obese women, and their wage penalty offsets the general premium to working in a job emphasizing public interaction. Together, these results suggest that taste-based discrimination may be driving occupational sorting among obese women and, as a result, is at least one source of the wage penalty experienced by obese women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2379575

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. J J Penninx, 2010, Overweight, Obesity, and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies, Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 220, 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Jose A Pagan, 1997, Obesity, Occupational Attainment, and Earnings, Social Science Quarterly, 78, 756

Cited by

  • Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity

    Rubino, F., Puhl, R. M., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Ryan, D. H., Mechanick, J. I., Nadglowski, J., Ramos Salas, X., Schauer, P. R., Twenefour, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0803-x · Cited by 1,152

    “Similarly, a US study reported that overweight women are more likely to work in lower-paying jobs and make less money compared with average-size women and all men 64 .”
    Background

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Shinall, J. B.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Shinall, Jennifer Bennett
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2336049756
Cited by
17
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
obesity, wage penalty, occupational sorting, gender pay gap, taste discrimination, obese women, job characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.