Moses, the Tutmoses and the Exodus
Open accessAbstract
The dating of the Exodus is generally given as inter alia, sometime during the reign of Raamsess II, Horemheb or Tutmosis III. The Raamsess II school () base their claim on the store-cities mentioned in Exodus ch.1; the proponents of Horemheb cite to the Book of Olam Rabbah,and the advocates of Tutmosis III raise the potent argument that the only biblical information dating the Exodus is found Kings I, noting that the Exodus occurred 480 years before Solomon began building the Temple, generally placed c. 970-960 BCE. This would set the Exodus c. 1450--1440 BCE, consistent with Joshua entering the Holy land about the turn of the century. Using current secular chronology, this reckoning places the Exodus during the reign of Tutmosis III, who reigned from 1479 to 1425 BCE. The birth and early palace years of Moses, which began 80 years before the Exodus, would then belong to the reigns of the Tutmoses I and II (who reigned from 1506 BCE to 1479 BCE). These three pharaohs, the only ones whose reigns are consistent with the chronological reference in Kings, are herein collectively referred to as “The Tutmoses.” Conventionists are loathe to veer either from the Horemheb school, or favor Raamsess a situation which has discouraged serious investigation by Biblical scholars knowledgeable in Hebrew language, legacy, legends and commentary into the reign of Tutmosis III as the pharaoh of the plagues and the Exodus. At the suggestion of Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan who identifies Tutmosis III as a potential Exodus-pharaoh, I investigate this possibility further. A systematic investigation of textual details and inferences depict a sequence of events incompatible with an Exodus during the reigns of Raamsess II or Horemheb, but supports Rabbi Kaplan’s thesis that Tutmosis III was the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Further investigation into the reigns of The Tutmoses provides corroborative evidence for the Biblical narrative.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seqenenre Taa died during the Theban-Hyksos conflict (1560-1555 BCE).
“- Political Crisis: Died during the Theban-Hyksos conflict (1560 -1555 BCE) [5].”
From The Exodus Enigma: Medical Clues to the Pharaoh's Identity (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
CT scans of Seqenenre Taa's mummy show fractures on the forehead, right cheek, and nasal bones.
“- CT Findings: Fractures on the forehead, right cheek, and nasal bones [5].”
From The Exodus Enigma: Medical Clues to the Pharaoh's Identity (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Exodus Enigma: Medical Clues to the Pharaoh's Identity
Alfishawy, M. (2025) · Journal of Medical and Health Studies · doi:10.32996/jmhs.2025.6.2.21
- Authors
- Billauer, B. P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Billauer, Barbara P.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1555004820
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Exodus, Moses, Horemheb, biblical chronology, Book of Kings, Book of Numbers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review